Doyle v. Sebelius

Filing 18

STIPULATION and ORDER Amending Scheduling Order signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 2/17/2010. (Esteves, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 B E N JA M IN B. WAGNER U n ite d States Attorney Y O S H IN O R I H. T. HIMEL #66194 A s sis ta n t U. S. Attorney 5 0 1 I Street, Suite 10-100 S a c ra m e n to , California 95814 T e le p h o n e : (916) 554-2760 A tto rn e ys for Defendant IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE E A S T E R N DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA C A T H E R IN E H. DOYLE, P la in tif f , v. K A T H L E E N SEBELIUS, Secretary, Dept. of H e a lth and Human Services, D e f e n d a n t. 1 :0 9 -c v -0 1 5 6 9 -O W W -D L B S T I P U L A T IO N AND ORDER A M E N D I N G SCHEDULING ORDER 16 17 18 19 20 21 D a te d : February 17, 2010 22 B y: 23 24 D a te d : February 17, 2010 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER T h e parties request that the Court amend the paragraph in the Scheduling Conference O rd e r filed January 28, 2010, Document 14, at page 6, lines 18-20, to read, "6. A dispute e x is ts on the amount of reimbursement owed to Medicare under 42 C.F.R. § 411.37." Y A R R A , KHARAZI & ASSOCIATES /s/ Nick Aniotzbehere NICK ANIOTZBEHERE B E N J A M IN B. WAGNER U n ite d States Attorney B y: /s/ Y H T Himel YOSHINORI H. T. HIMEL A s s is ta n t U. S. Attorney Page 1 1 ORDER 2 U p o n the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that the paragraph in the 3 S c h e d u lin g Conference Order filed January 28, 2010, Document 14, at page 6, lines 18-20, is 4 A M E N D E D to read: 5 6 . A dispute exists on the amount of reimbursement owed to Medicare under 42 C.F.R. 6 § 411.37. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER Dated: February 17, 2010 emm0d6 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Page 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?