Roberts v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
21
STIPULATION and ORDER to Extend Time signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 7/13/2010. ( Defendant's Opposition due by 8/11/2010) (Figueroa, O)
(SS) Roberts v. Commissioner of Social Security
Doc. 21
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration MARK A. WIN Special Assistant United States Attorney 333 Market Street, Suite 1500 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8980 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 E-Mail: Mark.Win@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 FRESNO DIVISION 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: July 12, 2010 /s/ Sengthiene Bosavanh (As authorized via telephone) SENGTHIENE BOSAVANH Attorney for Plaintiff KATHRYN ROBERTS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, ) Commissioner of ) Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) ___________________________________) CIVIL NO. 1:09-CV-01581 DLB STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME
The parties, through their respective counsel, stipulate that the time for filing Defendant's opposition to Plaintiff's opening brief be extended from July 12 to August 11, 2010. This is Defendant's second request for an extension of time to file a response to Plaintiff's opening brief. Defendant needs the additional time in order to further explore the possibility of settlement. Respectfully submitted,
Dockets.Justia.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Dated: July 12, 2010
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration /s/ Mark A. Win MARK A. WIN Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 9b0hie
July 13, 2010
/s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?