Ochoa v. Jean-Pierre
Filing
32
ORDER on Stipulation to Modify the Scheduling Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 10/30/12. Discovery due by 3/29/2013, Dispositive Motions filed by 5/31/2013. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Janine K. Jeffery, Esq. CBN 112639
Jjeffery@reilyjeffery.com
Oren Rosenthal, Esq. CBN 243110
Orosenthal@reilyjeffery.com
REILY & JEFFERY
19839 Nordhoff Street
Northridge, California 91324
Telephone: (818) 350-6282
Fax No.: (818) 350-6283
Attorneys for Defendant,
JEAN-PIERRE
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
RAYMOND OCHOA,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
DR. JEAN-PIERRE,
)
)
Defendant.
)
_____________________________________ )
CASE NO. CV 1-09-1627-MJS(PC)
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO
MODIFY THE AMENDED
SCHEDULING ORDER
(Filed Concurrently with Stipulation)
Hon. Michael J. Seng
U.S. Magistrate Judge
16
17
///
18
///
19
///
20
///
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
i
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
RAYMOND OCHOA,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
DR. JEAN-PIERRE,
)
)
Defendant.
)
_____________________________________ )
CASE NO. CV 1-09-1627-MJS(PC)
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO
MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER
16
17
Good cause exists to modify the amended scheduling order (ECF # 27):
18
19
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that
20
1)
The discovery cut-off date is continued to March 29, 2013.
2)
The date to file dispositive motions is continued to May 31, 2013.
21
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
Dated:
ci4d6
October 30, 2012
Michael J. Seng
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
26
27
28
1
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?