Anaya v. Herrington et al

Filing 18

ORDER DENYING Objections 17 signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 1/21/2010. (Figueroa, O)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Plaintiff Richard Ernest Anaya ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 19, 2010, Plaintiff filed an "Objections to Magistrate Denial of Amended Complaint." (Doc. 17.) Plaintiff appears to contend that the December 11, 2009 order of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (Doc. 15) would erroneously dismiss Plaintiff's amended complaint. Plaintiff then requests review of the Magistrate Judge's order. As previously stated, the December 11, 2009 order was issued by the Ninth Circuit, not by the undersigned. The order from the Ninth Circuit only states that Plaintiff's petition for writ of mandamus and all pending motions are denied as moot. However, this would not include Plaintiff's amended complaint. Plaintiff's amended complaint is not a motion before the Ninth Circuit, but is pending before this Court for screening. Plaintiff's objections are thus incorrect. Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's objections, filed on January 19, 2010, are DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 77e0d6 v. HERRINGTON, et al., Defendants. / RICHARD ERNEST ANAYA, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 1:09-cv-01653-DLB (PC) ORDER DENYING OBJECTIONS (Doc. 17) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT January 21, 2010 /s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?