Anaya v. Herrington et al

Filing 21

ORDER Regarding Voluntary Dismissal (Doc. 20 ), Response Due Within 20 Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 4/8/2010. (Response due by 4/30/2010) (Scrivner, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 77e0d6 28 1 Plaintiff Richard Ernest Anaya ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in a civil rights action. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal, filed April 5, 2010. Plaintiff seeks to voluntarily dismiss this action. However, Plaintiff contends his reasons for this dismissal are because of retaliatory actions by prison officials. Plaintiff alleges that they threatened him and denied his pain medications. A dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) must be voluntary. There is thus some question as to whether Plaintiff truly wishes to voluntarily dismiss his action. Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS Plaintiff to respond within twenty (20) days, indicating whether he intends to voluntarily dismiss his action. The Court will screen Plaintiff's amended complaint in due course if Plaintiff decides to proceed. Failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of this action for failure to obey a court order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: v. (Doc. 20) HERRINGTON, et al., RESPONSE DUE WITHIN 20 DAYS Defendants. / RICHARD ERNEST ANAYA, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 1:09-cv-01653-DLB PC ORDER REGARDING VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT April 8, 2010 /s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?