Walker v. Fresno Police Department et al

Filing 21

SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE by the United States Marshal Without Prepayment of Costs signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 12/21/2009. (Bradley, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 HAROLD WALKER, 9 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 JERRY DYER, et. al., 13 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff Harold Walker ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 17 pauperis in the action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 23, 2009, Plaintiff informed 18 the Court that he wished to proceed with his cognizable section 1983 claim against Defendant 19 Officers Alvarez, Aranas, Leibee, Dozier, Corona and Robles. 20 On December 3, 2009, the Court ordered Plaintiff to submit USM-285 forms for service 21 on Defendants Alvarez, Aranas, Leibee, Dozier, Corona and Robles. Although the Court 22 referenced Defendant Dozier in the body of the order, it inadvertently omitted his name from the 23 list of defendants to be served in the conclusion of the order. The order therefore listed five, 24 rather than six, defendants. 25 On December 15, 2009, the Court issued an order directing service by the United States 26 Marshal. This order again inadvertently omitted Defendant L. Dozier. 27 28 1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:09cv1667 OWW DLB SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE BY THE UNITED STATES MARSHAL WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF COSTS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Court forwarded service documents to the Marshal on December 15, 2009. The service documents forwarded are sufficient for service on six defendants. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that service is ALSO APPROPRIATE for Defendant L. Dozier, in accordance with the Court's December 15, 2009, order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 9b0hie December 21, 2009 /s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?