Walker v. Fresno Police Department et al

Filing 39

ORDER ADOPTING Findings and Recommendations That Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Be GRANTED IN PART, DENIED IN PART 24 , 37 , 38 , signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 9/29/10: Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's 4/28/10 and 5/ 27/10, pleadings is GRANTED; Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Claim for Warrantless Entry in Violation of the Fourth Amendment is DENIED; Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Claim for Unlawful Arrest in Violation of the Fourth Amendment is DENIED; Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Claim for Preparing False Police Reports is GRANTED; and Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Defendant Robles from the action is GRANTED. (Hellings, J)

Walker v. Fresno Police Department et al

Doc. 39

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - FRESNO DIVISION 11 12 13 Plaintiff, 14 15 16 FRESNO POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On August 23, 2010, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. These Findings and Recommendations were served on all parties appearing in the action and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within twenty (20) days after service of the order. No objections were filed. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis. Defendants. / Docket Nos. 24, 37, 38 v. HAROLD WALKER, CASE NO. 1:09-cv-01667-OWW-SKO ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS BE GRANTED IN PART, DENIED IN PART

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 29, 2010 emm0d6 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6. 5. 4. 3. 2. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Findings and Recommendations issued August 23, 2010, are ADOPTED IN FULL; Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's April 28, 2010, and May 27, 2010, pleadings is GRANTED; Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Claim for Warrantless Entry in Violation of the Fourth Amendment is DENIED; Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Claim for Unlawful Arrest in Violation of the Fourth Amendment is DENIED; Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Claim for Preparing False Police Reports is GRANTED; and Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Defendant Robles from the action is GRANTED.