Beaty v. City Of Fresno et al
Filing
52
ORDER Taking Motions Under Submission (Doc. 47 , 49 ), signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 4/8/2010. (Scrivner, E)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Defendants. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Dated: b9ed48 / Currently pending before this Court are several motions to dismiss the complaint. The parties filed a stipulation on April 2, 2010 indicating that plaintiff anticipates filing an amended complaint. (Doc. 50.) This anticipated amended complaint has not yet been filed. Any opposition to the motions is untimely. Accordingly, the Court VACATES the April 19, 2010 hearing and will decide the motions on the moving papers (Local Rule 230(c) (g)), unless on or before April 14, 2010, plaintiff files an amended complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. April 8, 2010 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE vs. CITY OF FRESNO, et al. GLEN BEATY, Plaintiff, CASE NO. CV F 09-1684 LJO GSA ORDER TAKING MOTIONS UNDER SUBMISSION (Doc. 47, 49) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
