Ross et al v. Atico International USA, Inc., et al.

Filing 52

ORDER on 18 Plaintiffs' motion to compel production of documents and answers to interrogatories signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 8/27/2010. (Timken, A)

Download PDF
Ross et al v. Atico International USA, Inc., et al. Doc. 52 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stephen R. Cornwell, CA Bar #40737 CORNWELL & SAMPLE, LLP Attorneys at Law 7045 N. Fruit Avenue Fresno, CA 93711-0761 Telephone: (559) 431-3142 Facsimile: (559) 436-1135 Attorneys for Plaintiffs TRACY ROSS, as Guardian ad Litem of MAGGIE CHRISTINE ROSS; INA PATE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION TRACY ROSS, as Guardian ad Litem of MAGGIE CHRISTINE ROSS; INA PATE, Plaintiffs, v. ATICO INTERNATIONAL USA, INC.; WALGREEN COMPANY; and DOES 1 to 50, inclusive. Defendants. CASE: 1:09-CV-01732-OWW-SKO ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES This matter came before the Court on August 12, 2010, on the Plaintiffs' motion to compel further responses to interrogatories and to compel further documents. The Court ordered the parties to meet and confer. Following the parties' meet and confer, the matter came before the Court. The Court heard arguments, stipulations, and withdrawals by the parties with respect to each of the disputed discovery requests. The Court ruled on each discovery dispute from the bench and ordered Plaintiffs' counsel to prepare a proposed order that conformed to the Court's ruling. Defendants' counsel was to approve the form and content of the ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES Dockets.Justia.com 1 proposed order before it was submitted to the Court. The parties submitted the 2 following proposed order: 3 1. The period of time for all requests, unless otherwise directed, is 4 amended so that the period of 2001 through 2005 is the modification of all 5 interrogatories and requests for the production of documents. 6 2. The Court rejects the restrictive definition of a Kiddee Folding Chair as 7 set forth in the defendants' responses and adopts the broader definition of the chair 8 as set forth in the requests. 9 3. With respect to the motion to compel interrogatories propounded to 10 ATICO, the Court grants the motions as to interrogatories Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11, 11 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, and 23. The motion is granted as to interrogatory No. 7 12 as to information given to Walgreens. The motion is denied as to Nos. 10 and 24. 13 4. With respect to the motion to compel the production of documents by 14 ATICO, the Court grants Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 16, 17, 18, and 19. 15 The request to No. 20 is withdrawn. The defendant is ordered to answer request No. 16 22, 26, and 27. 17 5. With respect to the interrogatories directed to Walgreens, the Court 18 grants the motion as to interrogatories Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, and 12. With 19 respect to No. 8, the Court orders the production of such documents with respect to 20 Kiddee Folding Chairs to Walgreens. 21 6. With respect to the requests to produce documents to Walgreens, the 22 Court grants the motion with respect to Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 16, 23 17, 18, and 21. Request No. 19 is withdrawn. 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES 1 IT IS ORDERED that Defendants shall respond as detailed above no later 2 than September 3, 2010. 3 Approved as to form: 4 5 Stephen R. Cornwell 6 /s/ Stephen R. Cornwell August 19, 2010 Attorney for the Plaintiff and moving party August _20__, 2010 7 __/s/___________________ Bruce Berger 8 Attorney for the Defendant and responding party 9 10 11 12 13 DEAC_Signature-END: IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 27, 2010 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 ie14hje 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 C O R N W ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?