Lederle v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 17

ORDER Granting Extension of Time signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 12/14/2010. (Leon-Guerrero, A)

Download PDF
(SS) Lederle v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Parties have stipulated by counsel to extend the period of time for the Respondent to file respond to Appellant's Opening Brief. Notably, this is the second extension sought by the Respondent. The first extension was granted by the Court on November 3, 2010 (Doc. 15), setting the due date as December 2, 2010 per the parties' stipulation and in accord with the Scheduling Order that allows a single thirty day extension by stipulation (Doc. 4). A request after the single thirty day extension "will be granted only for good cause." (Doc. 4 at 4). Both requests for extension of time have been made "due to a continuing heavy workload, to include several briefs with concurrent due dates." (Doc. 14 at 1, Doc. 16 at 1). Good cause has therefore been shown for this extension of time. However, in light of the previous extensions, the Court will not grant another extension without a showing of exceptional good cause. 1 LONITA LEDERLE, ) Case No.: 1:09-cv-01736 JLT ) Appellant, ) ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME ) v. ) (Doc. 16) ) MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Respondent. ) _______________________________________ ) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED: Respondent is granted an extension of time until January 3, 2011, to file his response to the Appellant's Opening Brief. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 14, 2010 9j7khi /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?