Rodriguez v. Pearson et al

Filing 12

ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 11 Motion for Service of Process by United States Marshall as Premature signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 4/30/2010. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff Joes Garcia Rodriguez, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Plaintiff filed the complaint upon which this action proceeds on October 5, 2009, and the Court granted Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis on October 7, 2009. Now pending before the Court is Plaintiff's request that the United States Marshal be directed to serve the Complaint on Defendants, filed December 23, 2009. Plaintiff is advised that the Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally "frivolous or malicious," that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b)(1),(2). "Notwithstanding any filing fee, or any portion thereof, that may have been paid, the court shall dismiss the case at any time if the court determines that . . . the action or appeal . . . fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted." 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). The Court will direct the United States Marshal to serve the Complaint only after it has 1 v. PEARSON, et al., Defendants. / JOSE GARCIA RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 1:09-cv-01746-SMS ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS BY UNITED STATES MARSHALL AS PREMATURE (Doc. 11) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 determined that the Complaint contains cognizable claims for relief against the named defendants. The Court has not yet screened Plaintiff's complaint, but will do so in due course. Until the Court has screened the Complaint, any request for service by the Marshal is premature and will be denied. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for Service of Process by United States Marshall, filed December 23, 2009, is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: icido3 April 30, 2010 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?