Willis, et al. v. City Of Fresno, et al.

Filing 135

STIPULATION and ORDER TO RESET MOTION HEARING as to 85 MOTION to COMPEL Records in Response to Document Subpoena : Motion Hearing is RESET from 7/15/2011 to 8/4/2011 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (DLB) before Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 7/8/2011. (Hernandez, M)

1
2
3
4

Walter H. Walker, III (SBN 63117)
Peter J. Koenig (SBN 132437)
Rana Ansari-Jaberi (SBN 262008)
Walker, Hamilton & Koenig LLP
50 Francisco Street, Suite 460
San Francisco, CA 94133-2100
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

5

8

Richard P. Berman (SBN 55462)
Law Offices of Richard P. Berman
2333 Merced Street
Fresno, CA 93721
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

9

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

6
7

10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - FRESNO DIVISION

12
13

Chris Willis, Mary Willis, individually and
successors in interest to Stephen Willis;
Jennafer Uribe,

14

Case No. 1:09-cv-01766-LJO-DLB
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED
ORDER FOR A CONTINUANCE OF
THE HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS CHRIS
AND MARY WILLIS’S MOTION TO
COMPEL FRESNO COUNTY DISTRICT
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE’S PRODUCTION
OF RECORDS IN RESPONSE TO
DOCUMENT SUBPOENA

Plaintiffs,

15

vs.

16

City of Fresno, Officer Greg Catton,
Officer Daniel Astacio, Chief Jerry Dyer,
and DOES 1 through 50 inclusive,

17
18

Defendants.

19

Date of hearing: July 15, 2011 August 4, 2011
Time of hearing: 9:00 a.m.
Courtroom: 9

20

The Honorable Dennis L. Beck

21

Complaint Filed: 10/07/09
Trial Date: 9/12/11

22
23

It is hereby stipulated between Plaintiffs Chris and Mary Willis and the Fresno County

24

District Attorney’s Office, through their respective counsel, that the date for the Motion for

25

Plaintiffs Chris and Mary Willis’s Motion to Compel Fresno County District Attorney’s Office’s

26
27
28

1
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS CHRIS AND MARY
WILLIS’S MOTION TO COMPEL FRESNO COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE’S PRODUCTION OF RECORDS IN
RESPONSE TO DOCUMENT SUBPOENA

1

Production of Records in Response to Document Subpoena (Document #85), presently scheduled

2

for July 15, 2011, be continued, to August 4, 2011, at 9:00 in Department 9, due to, in part, the

3

Court’s unavailability on July 22, 2011, and to provide the parties additional time to

4

meaningfully meet and confer, in their efforts at informally resolving said discovery dispute.

5
6

IT IS SO STIPULATED:

7

DATED: July 8, 2011

WALKER, HAMILTON & KOENIG LLP

8
9

By:

10
11
12

DATED: July 8, 2011

/s/ Rana Ansari-Jaberi
Walter H. Walker, III.
Peter J. Koenig
Rana Ansari-Jaberi
Attorneys for plaintiffs

FRESNO COUNTY COUNSEL

13
14

By:

15

/s/Michael Linden
Michael Linden
Attorneys for Fresno County DA’s Office

16
17
18

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

July 8, 2011

/s/ Dennis L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS CHRIS AND MARY
WILLIS’S MOTION TO COMPEL FRESNO COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE’S PRODUCTION OF RECORDS IN
RESPONSE TO DOCUMENT SUBPOENA