Willis, et al. v. City Of Fresno, et al.

Filing 135

STIPULATION and ORDER TO RESET MOTION HEARING as to 85 MOTION to COMPEL Records in Response to Document Subpoena : Motion Hearing is RESET from 7/15/2011 to 8/4/2011 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (DLB) before Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 7/8/2011. (Hernandez, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 Walter H. Walker, III (SBN 63117) Peter J. Koenig (SBN 132437) Rana Ansari-Jaberi (SBN 262008) Walker, Hamilton & Koenig LLP 50 Francisco Street, Suite 460 San Francisco, CA 94133-2100 Phone: (415) 986-3339 Fax: (415) 986-1618 5 8 Richard P. Berman (SBN 55462) Law Offices of Richard P. Berman 2333 Merced Street Fresno, CA 93721 Phone: (559) 233-2333 Fax: (559) 233-6947 9 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 6 7 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - FRESNO DIVISION 12 13 Chris Willis, Mary Willis, individually and successors in interest to Stephen Willis; Jennafer Uribe, 14 Case No. 1:09-cv-01766-LJO-DLB STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS CHRIS AND MARY WILLIS’S MOTION TO COMPEL FRESNO COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE’S PRODUCTION OF RECORDS IN RESPONSE TO DOCUMENT SUBPOENA Plaintiffs, 15 vs. 16 City of Fresno, Officer Greg Catton, Officer Daniel Astacio, Chief Jerry Dyer, and DOES 1 through 50 inclusive, 17 18 Defendants. 19 Date of hearing: July 15, 2011 August 4, 2011 Time of hearing: 9:00 a.m. Courtroom: 9 20 The Honorable Dennis L. Beck 21 Complaint Filed: 10/07/09 Trial Date: 9/12/11 22 23 It is hereby stipulated between Plaintiffs Chris and Mary Willis and the Fresno County 24 District Attorney’s Office, through their respective counsel, that the date for the Motion for 25 Plaintiffs Chris and Mary Willis’s Motion to Compel Fresno County District Attorney’s Office’s 26 27 28 1 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS CHRIS AND MARY WILLIS’S MOTION TO COMPEL FRESNO COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE’S PRODUCTION OF RECORDS IN RESPONSE TO DOCUMENT SUBPOENA 1 Production of Records in Response to Document Subpoena (Document #85), presently scheduled 2 for July 15, 2011, be continued, to August 4, 2011, at 9:00 in Department 9, due to, in part, the 3 Court’s unavailability on July 22, 2011, and to provide the parties additional time to 4 meaningfully meet and confer, in their efforts at informally resolving said discovery dispute. 5 6 IT IS SO STIPULATED: 7 DATED: July 8, 2011 WALKER, HAMILTON & KOENIG LLP 8 9 By: 10 11 12 DATED: July 8, 2011 /s/ Rana Ansari-Jaberi Walter H. Walker, III. Peter J. Koenig Rana Ansari-Jaberi Attorneys for plaintiffs FRESNO COUNTY COUNSEL 13 14 By: 15 /s/Michael Linden Michael Linden Attorneys for Fresno County DA’s Office 16 17 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 8, 2011 /s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS CHRIS AND MARY WILLIS’S MOTION TO COMPEL FRESNO COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE’S PRODUCTION OF RECORDS IN RESPONSE TO DOCUMENT SUBPOENA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?