Willis, et al. v. City Of Fresno, et al.

Filing 263

STIPULATION and ORDER Setting All Currently Pending Motions Before the Court to be Heard on March 28, 2014: Based on the Stipulation of the parties (Doc. 262), the hearing on Defendants' Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law pursuant to Rule 5 0(b), Defendants' Motion for Relief from the Judgment of this Court pursuant to Rule 66(b), and Plaintiff's Motion for Court Review of Objections to Defendants' Bill of Cost (Docs. 244, 245, 252, 257) are CONTINUED (from 3/14/2014) to March 28, 2014, at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. The deadlines for filing oppositiion and reply briefs are due according to the original date of hearing. Local Rule 230. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 2/27/2014. (Herman, H)

Download PDF
1 James D. Weakley, Esq. Roy C. Santos, Esq. Bar No. 082853 Bar No. 259718 2 3 4 Weakley & Arendt, LLP 1630 East Shaw Ave., Suite 176 Fresno, California 93710 Telephone: (559) 221-5256 Facsimile: (559) 221-5262 5 6 Attorneys for Defendants, CITY OF FRESNO, OFFICER GREG CATTON and OFFICER DANIEL ASTACIO 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 CHRIS WILLIS, MARY WILLIS, INDIVIDUALLY AND SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST TO STEPHEN WILLIS; JENNAFER URIBE, 14 Plaintiffs, 15 vs. 16 17 18 CITY OF FRESNO, OFFICER GREG CATTON, OFFICER DANIEL ASTACIO, CHIEF JERRY DYER, and DOES 1 through 50 inclusive, Defendants. 19 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:09-CV-01766-BAM STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING ALL CURRENTLY PENDING MOTIONS BEFORE THE COURT TO BE HEARD ON MARCH 28, 2014 Judge: U.S. Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe 20 21 1. It is hereby stipulated between the parties, through their respective counsel, that 22 the date for Defendants’ Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law to Rule 50(b) and Motion for 23 Relief from the Final Judgment or Orders of the Court, now scheduled for March 14, 2014, be 24 extended two weeks, to March 28, 2014, at 9:00 a.m., in Courtroom 8, to accommodate James 25 D. Weakley’s pre-planned CAL-ABOTA Board meeting in San Diego on March 14, 2014. 26 2. It is also hereby stipulated between the parties, through their respective counsel, 27 that the date for Plaintiffs’ Motion for Review of and Objections to Defendant Daniel Astacio’s 28 Bill of Costs, set for March 21, 2014, be extended to March 28, 2014, the date of Plaintiffs’ Stipulation and Order Setting All Currently Pending Motions Before the Court to be Heard on March 28, 2014 1 1 Motion for New Trial. It is further stipulated that this stipulation does not constitute a waiver of 2 Defendants’ objection that the currently scheduled hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Review of 3 and Objections to Defendant Daniel Astacio’s Bill of Costs is premature. 4 IT IS SO STIPULATED: 5 DATED: February 26, 2014 WEAKLEY & ARENDT, LLP 6 By: 7 8 /s/ James D. Weakley______________ James D. Weakley Roy C. Santos Attorneys for Defendants 9 10 DATED: February 26, 2014 WALTER, HAMILTON & KOENIG, LLP 11 By: 12 13 /s/ Peter Koenig___________________ Walter Walker Peter Koenig Attorneys for Plaintiff 14 ORDER 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Based on the Stipulation of the parties (Doc. 262), the hearings on Defendants’ Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law pursuant to Rule 50(b), Defendants’ Motion for Relief from the Judgment of this Court pursuant to Rule 60(b), and Plaintiff’s Motion for Court Review of Objections to Defendants’ Bill of Costs (Doc. 244, 245, 252, 257) are CONTINUED to March 28, 2014, at 9:00 AM, in Courtroom 8, before United States Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. The deadlines for filing opposition and reply briefs are due according to the original date of hearing. Local Rule 230. 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 Dated: /s/ Barbara February 27, 2014 A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 Stipulation and Order Setting All Currently Pending Motions Before the Court to be Heard on March 28, 2014 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?