Willis, et al. v. City Of Fresno, et al.

Filing 342

ORDER Granting Defendants' Motion for STAY of Enforcement of the Judgment without Requiring a Bond (Doc. 336). The hearing set for October 10, 2014 is VACATED. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 9/19/2014. (Herman, H)

1

James D. Weakley, Esq.
Roy C. Santos, Esq.

Bar No. 082853
Bar No. 259718

2
Weakley & Arendt, LLP
1630 East Shaw Ave., Suite 176
Fresno, California 93710
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

3
4
5
6
7

Attorneys for Defendants, CITY OF FRESNO, OFFICER GREG CATTON
and OFFICER DANIEL ASTACIO

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13

CHRIS WILLIS, MARY WILLIS,
INDIVIDUALLY AND SUCCESSORS IN
INTEREST TO STEPHEN WILLIS;
JENNAFER URIBE,
Plaintiffs,

14

vs.

15
16
17

CITY OF FRESNO, OFFICER GREG
CATTON, OFFICER DANIEL ASTACIO,
CHIEF JERRY DYER, and DOES 1 through
50 inclusive,

18

Defendants.

19

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 1:09-CV-01766-BAM
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR STAY OF
ENFORCEMENT OF THE JUDGMENT
WITHOUT REQUIRING A BOND
Date: October 10, 2014
Time: 9:00 a.m.
Ctrm: 8
The Honorable Barbara A. McAuliffe
Complaint Filed:10/07/09

20
The parties, through their counsel, stipulate to the following Order:

21

It is hereby ORDERED by the Court in the above entitled action, that Defendants CITY

22
23
24

OF FRESNO, OFFICER GREG CATTON and OFFICER DANIEL ASTACIO, (collectively
“Defendants”), motion for stay of enforcement of the judgment without requiring a bond is
////

25
////
26

////

27
28
Defendants’ Amended Proposed Order

1

1

GRANTED. Enforcement of the judgment without requiring a bond shall be stayed until such

2

time as the appellate process in the above entitled action, including any and all appeals to the

3

United States Supreme Court, has concluded.

4

The hearing set for October 10, 2014 is VACATED.

5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7

Dated:

/s/ Barbara

September 19, 2014

A. McAuliffe

_

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Defendants’ Amended Proposed Order

2