Willis, et al. v. City Of Fresno, et al.
Filing
374
AMENDED JUDGMENT in a CIVIL CASE signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 12/04/2017. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
CHRIS WILLIS, MARY WILLIS,
INDIVIDUALLY AND SUCCESSORS IN
INTEREST TO STEPHEN WILLIS,
13
14
15
AMENDED JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL
CASE
Plaintiffs,
11
12
CASE NO. 1:09-CV-01766-BAM
v.
CITY OF FRESNO, OFFICER GREG
CATTON, and OFFICER DANIEL
ASTACIO,
Defendants.
16
17
DECISION BY the COURT: This action came to trial before the Court on November 6,
18 2017. The Judgment shall be AMENDED to reflect as follows:
19
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUGED AND DECREED that judgment is entered in
20 accordance with the Special Verdict and the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in favor of
21 plaintiffs Chris Wills and Mary Willis, as successors in Interest to Stephen Willis, and against
22 defendant Greg Catton in the amount of $25,001.00.
23
JURY VERDICT: This action came before the Court for trial by jury. The issues have
24 been tried and the jury has rendered its Special Verdict on December 17, 2013.
25
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that judgment is entered in
26 accordance with the Special Verdict in favor of plaintiffs Chris Willis, Individually, and Mary
27 Willis, Individually, and against defendants Greg Catton and the City of Fresno in the amount of
28 $302,044.80 (20% of $1,510,224.00).
1
1
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that judgment is entered in
2 accordance with the Special Verdict in favor of defendant Daniel Astacio and against plaintiffs
3 Chris Willis and Mary Willis, Individually and as Successors in Interest to Stephen Willis.
4
5 IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
December 4, 2017
7
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?