Fields v. Junious et al

Filing 105

ORDER Requiring Parties to Notify Court Whether Settlement Conference Would Be Beneficial, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 4/15/2013. Notice due within twenty (20) days. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 KEVIN E. FIELDS, 8 Plaintiff, 9 10 v. Case No. 1:09-cv-01771-AWI-DLB PC ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO NOTIFY COURT WHETHER SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE WOULD BE BENEFICIAL J. TUCKER, et al., TWENTY DAY DEADLINE 11 Defendants. 12 Plaintiff Kevin E. Fields (“Plaintiff”) is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 13 14 forma pauperis in this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s 15 Eighth Amendment claim regarding unsanitary conditions in his cell against Defendants Hernandez, 16 Molina, Marsh, and Tucker, and on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claim regarding inadequate 17 temperature in his cell against Defendants Hernandez, Molina, and Marsh. 18 Within twenty (20) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff and Defendants are 19 each to file a written response indicating whether a court settlement conference would be beneficial 20 in resolving this action. If both parties agree, the Court will issue a further scheduling order setting 21 this matter for settlement conference before a Magistrate Judge or District Judge from the United 22 States District Court, Eastern District of California. 23 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 26 27 28 /s/ Dennis April 15, 2013 L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: 77e0d6 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?