Fields v. Junious et al
Filing
105
ORDER Requiring Parties to Notify Court Whether Settlement Conference Would Be Beneficial, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 4/15/2013. Notice due within twenty (20) days. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
KEVIN E. FIELDS,
8
Plaintiff,
9
10
v.
Case No. 1:09-cv-01771-AWI-DLB PC
ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO
NOTIFY COURT WHETHER
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE WOULD
BE BENEFICIAL
J. TUCKER, et al.,
TWENTY DAY DEADLINE
11
Defendants.
12
Plaintiff Kevin E. Fields (“Plaintiff”) is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se and in
13
14
forma pauperis in this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s
15
Eighth Amendment claim regarding unsanitary conditions in his cell against Defendants Hernandez,
16
Molina, Marsh, and Tucker, and on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claim regarding inadequate
17
temperature in his cell against Defendants Hernandez, Molina, and Marsh.
18
Within twenty (20) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff and Defendants are
19
each to file a written response indicating whether a court settlement conference would be beneficial
20
in resolving this action. If both parties agree, the Court will issue a further scheduling order setting
21
this matter for settlement conference before a Magistrate Judge or District Judge from the United
22
States District Court, Eastern District of California.
23
24
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
26
27
28
/s/ Dennis
April 15, 2013
L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
77e0d6
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?