Rodriguez v. Isaac et al

Filing 17

ORDER DENYING 9 Motion as Moot Motion to Grant Injunctive Reflief and Request for Extension Signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 6/28/2010. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NOEL RODRIGUEZ, 9 Plaintiff, 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: 0m8i78 June 28, 2010 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff Noel Rodriguez ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 14, 2009, the Court ordered Plaintiff to submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the $350 filing fee within forty-five days. (Doc. 5.) Plaintiff responded with the instant Motion to Grant Injunctive Relief and Punitive Damages due to Malicious Prejudice and Request for Extension. (Doc. 9.) Plaintiff asks the Court to enjoin Defendants from interfering with his ability to file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. On November 24, 2009, Plaintiff submitted a Motion to Proceed in form pauperis. (Doc. 11.) The Court granted Plaintiff's motion on December 1, 2009. (Doc. 14.) Because the Court has now granted Plaintiff pauper status, Plaintiff's request for injunctive relief is moot. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion to Grant Injunctive Relief and Punitive Damages due to Malicious Prejudice and Request for Extension [Doc. 9] is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. v. ISSAC (COUNSELOR), et al., (Doc. 9) Defendants. / ORDER DENYING AS MOOT MOTION TO GRANT INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND REQUEST FOR EXTENSION CASE NO. 1:09-cv-1784-AWI-MJS (PC) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?