Horne et al v. United States Department of Agriculture et al

Filing 22

ORDER DENYING Plaintiffs' 14 Motion for Summary Judgment; ORDER GRANTING Defendants' 15 Motion for Summary Judgment; ORDER DIRECTING Clerk to Enter Judgment in Favor of Defendants signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 2/16/2011. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S)

Horne et al v. United States Department of Agriculture et al

Doc. 22

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney BENJAMIN E. HALL (SBN 219924) Assistant United States Attorney United States Courthouse 2500 Tulare Street, Suite 4401 Fresno, California 93721 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 This matter came before the Court on January 31, 2011, for hearing on the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment (Docs. 14, 15). Brian C. Leighton, Esq., appeared on behalf of v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE; TOM VILSACK, Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture (in his official capacity), MARVIN D. HORNE, LAURA R. HORNE, and RAISIN VALLEY FARMS MARKETING LLC, Plaintiffs, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:09-cv-01790-OWW-SKO ORDER REGARDING CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Plaintiffs, Marvin D. Horne, Laura R. Horne, and Raisin Valley Farms Marketing LLC. Benjamin E. Hall, Assistant United States

Attorney, appeared on behalf of Defendants, United States Department of Agriculture and Tom Vilsack, Secretary. The matter

was argued and submitted, and on February 7, 2011, the Court 1
ORDER REGARDING CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

issued its Memorandum Decision Regarding Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment (Doc. 20). Court's Memorandum Decision, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 1. 2. 3. Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment is DENIED. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. The clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendants. For the reasons stated in the

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 16, 2011

/s/ OLIVER W. WANGER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2
ORDER REGARDING CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT