Good et al v. California Dept. of Corrections et al

Filing 28

ORDER DENYING 26 and 27 Plaintiff's Motions to Compel, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 9/3/2010. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
(PC) Good et al v. California Dept. of Corrections et al Doc. 28 1 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 3 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 JOHN GOOD, 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 6i0kij Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action. Plaintiff has consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Pending before the court are Plaintiff's motions to compel the production of documents. Plaintiff seeks an order directing officials at California Correctional Institution Tehachapi to produce certain official records. Plaintiff also seeks an order directing officials to release to Plaintiff all of his medical records. No ORDER allowing discovery has been issued in this case. Once Defendants have filed an answer, a discovery order will be entered, opening discovery and setting a schedule for litigation. Until such time as discovery has been opened, no discovery may be had by any party and no discovery motions will be entertained. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motions to compel the production of documents filed on November 23, 2010, are denied. ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CDCR, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) NO. 1:09-cv-01791 GSA PC ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO COMPEL (Docs. 26, 27) September 3, 2010 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?