Sims v. Guirbino
Filing
15
ORDER Striking Motion to Appoint Counsel 14 , signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 10/14/11. No Further Filings will be Accepted in this Closed Case. (Verduzco, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
ROBERT SIMS,
Case: No. 1:09-cv-01850-GBC (PC)
10
ORDER STRIKING MOTION TO APPOINT
COUNSEL
Plaintiff,
11
v.
(Doc. 14)
12
GEORGE J. GUIRBINO,
NO FURTHER FILINGS WILL BE
ACCEPTED IN THIS CLOSED CASE
13
14
Defendant.
/
15
16
Robert Sims (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this
17
civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 21, 2009, Plaintiff filed his
18
original complaint. (Doc. 1). On June 8, 2011, the Court issued an order to show cause as to why
19
the action should not be dismissed based on failure to exhaust administrative remedies. (Doc. 11).
20
On June 16, 2011, the order was returned as undeliverable and the Court sent out a notice that the
21
change of address was due by August 25, 2011. On September 6, 2011, the action was dismissed
22
for failure to prosecute. (Doc. 12). On October 6, 2011, Plaintiff filed an unsigned motion
23
requesting for the Court to appoint counsel.
24
Every pleading, written motion, and any other papers submitted to the court must be signed.
25
Local Rule 131; Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a). As the action has been dismissed Plaintiff’s motion for the
26
appointment of counsel is moot. Moreover Plaintiff’s motion is unsigned, therefore the Court will
27
not consider Plaintiff’s unsigned motion.
28
///
1
1
Based on the foregoing, the Court HEREBY ORDERS:
2
1.
3
Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel filed October 6, 2011, is ordered to be
STRICKEN due to lack of signature; and
4
2.
No further filings will be accepted in this closed case.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
Dated:
0jh02o
October 14, 2011
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?