Quezada v. Fisher et al

Filing 39

ORDER re Screening Following Mandate, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 6/30/14. (Verduzco, M)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8
9

ALVARO QUEZADA,

10

Plaintiff,

11
12

v.
R. FISHER, et al.,

13

Defendants.

14
15

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1:09-cv-01856-LJO-BAM (PC)
ORDER RE SCREENING FOLLOWING
MANDATE
(ECF Nos. 1, 36, 38)

16
17

Plaintiff Alvaro Quezada (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

18

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff initiated this action on

19

October 22, 2009. On July 30, 2012, the Court dismissed this action as duplicative. Plaintiff

20

appealed.

21

On May 29, 2014, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed the Court’s

22

dismissal order and remanded the action for further proceedings. The Ninth Circuit issued its

23

mandate on June 26, 2014. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s complaint, filed on October 22, 2009, shall

24

be screened in due course pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a).

25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26

Dated:

/s/ Barbara

June 30, 2014

27

A. McAuliffe

_

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

28
1