Quezada v. Fisher et al
Filing
56
ORDER Requiring Plaintiff to File Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition within Twenty-One Days signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 05/22/2015. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ALVARO QUEZADA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
R. FISHER, et al.,
15
Defendants.
Case No. 1:09-cv-01856-LJO-BAM PC
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE
OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NONOPPOSITION WITHIN TWENTY-ONE
DAYS
(ECF No. 54)
16
17
_____________________________________/
18
Plaintiff Alvaro Quezada, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed
19 this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on October 22, 2009. This action proceeds
20 against Defendants Fisher, Jose, Doria, Scott and Ortiz for violation of the Fourteenth Amendment
21 to the United States Constitution.
22
On April 24, 2015, Defendants Fisher, Scott, Ortiz and Jose filed a motion for summary
23 judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56. Plaintiff was provided with notice of the requirements for opposing
24 a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 54-1.) Plaintiff’s opposition was due on or before
25 May 18, 2015. To date, Plaintiff has not filed an opposition.
26
27 ///
28 ///
Pursuant to Local Rule 230(l), Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED to file an opposition or a
1 statement of non-opposition to Defendant’s motion within twenty-one (21) days. Plaintiff is
2 warned that the failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this action, with
3 prejudice, for failure to prosecute.
4
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
May 22, 2015
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?