Bernard Brinkley v. Pam Ahlin et al

Filing 28

ORDER DISCHARGING Order to Show Cause 26 , 27 , signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 6/3/13. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 BERNARD BRINKLEY, CASE No. 1:09-cv-01858-MJS (PC) 11 ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Plaintiff, 12 v. (ECF Nos. 26, 27) 13 14 PAM AHLIN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 ________________________________/ 17 Plaintiff Bernard Brinkley is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 5.) This action 19 proceeds on the Second Amended Complaint against Defendant Joginder Singh, Chief 20 Medical Officer, Coalinga State Hospital, for the violation of Plaintiff’s substantive due 21 process right to adequate medical care. (ECF No. 19.) 22 On October 2, 2012, the Court ordered service upon Defendant Singh by the 23 U.S. Marshal, and imposed a service deadline of February 4, 2013. (ECF No. 24.) 24 Defendant Singh, however, could not be located despite numerous attempts. The 25 Marshal thereupon certified inability to locate this Defendant and returned process 26 unexecuted. (ECF No. 25.) 27 The Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be 28 -1- 1 dismissed for failure to provide the U.S. Marshal with information sufficient to effect 2 timely service of the summons and complaint. (ECF No. 26.) Plaintiff timely responded 3 that Defendant Singh is currently employed at the Department of State Hospitals 4 Coalinga facility. (ECF No. 27.) 5 Based upon the foregoing, the Order to show cause (ECF No. 26) is hereby 6 DISCHARGED. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 Dated: ci4d6 10 June 3, 2013 Michael J. Seng /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?