Escriba v. Foster Poultry Farms, Inc.

Filing 181

STIPULATION and ORDER Amending Pre-Trial Statement to Allow Additional Exhibit and to Withdraw/Modify Certain Objections, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 7/12/2011. (Kusamura, W)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Robert Borton, State Bar No. 53191 Elizabeth Kristen, State Bar No. 218227 Sharon Terman, State Bar No. 237236 THE LEGAL AID SOCIETY EMPLOYMENT LAW CENTER 180 Montgomery Street, Suite 600 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 864-8848 Facsimile: (415) 593-0096 Attorneys for Plaintiff Maria Escriba 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Armand George Skol, State Bar No. 058974 William A. Lapcevic, State Bar No. 238893 ARATA, SWINGLE, SODHI & VAN EGMOND 912 11TH Street, First Floor (95354) Post Office Box 3287 Modesto, CA 95353 Telephone: (209) 522-2211 Facsimile: (209) 522-2980 Attorneys for Defendant Foster Poultry Farms, A California Corporation 15 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 FRESNO DIVISION 18 19 MARIA ESCRIBA, Plaintiff, 20 21 22 v. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, A California Corporation, 23 24 Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No.: 1:09-CV-01878-OWW-MJS JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER AMENDING PRE-TRIAL STATEMENT TO ALLOW ADDITIONAL EXHIBIT AND TO WITHDRAW/MODIFY CERTAIN OBJECTIONS TRIAL DATE: JULY 14, 2011 TIME: 9:00AM COURTROOM 3 HONORABLE OLIVER WANGER 25 26 Plaintiff Maria Escriba and Defendant Foster Poultry Farms submit the following Joint 27 Stipulation and Proposed Order to request that, upon the parties’ agreement shown herein, the 28 Joint Stipulation and Order to Amend Pre-Trial Statement -- Case No. 09-01878-OWW-MSJ Page 1 1 Court enter its Order in the proposed form set forth below. The purpose of this Stipulation and 2 Proposed Order is to allow the parties to modify the JOINT EXHIBIT LIST of trial exhibits to 3 add one additional Exhibit (and to amend the FINAL PRE-TRIAL ORDER accordingly), and 4 also to reflect the withdrawal or modification of objections to certain discovery documents and 5 deposition designations proposed by Defendant for use at trial. Joint Stipulation 6 It is hereby stipulated between the Parties to this action, by and through their counsel of 7 8 9 10 11 12 record herein, that the Court is respectfully requested to enter the Proposed Order set forth following this Stipulation, to allow certain agreed modifications to the trial documents that have been submitted by the parties, and to amend, to the extent necessary, the Court’s FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER to allow such modifications. The agreed modifications are set forth in the following paragraphs. 1. Plaintiff may amend its portion of the JOINT EXHIBIT LIST to add one additional 13 exhibit, consisting of five pages and identified as “Handwritten notes of John Dias dated 14 1/3/08 and 1/4/07(sic)”, such exhibit to be numbered Exhibit 123. The Court’s FINAL 15 PRE-TRIAL ORDER shall be deemed amended accordingly. 16 2. Plaintiff withdraws her Objections and Opposition, based upon timeliness, to the 17 designation of the Depositions of Alfonso Flores and Carla Escriba. All other objections, 18 foundational or substantive, to the contents of those designated deposition excerpts, are 19 preserved. (For reference, Plaintiff’s Objections and Opposition to these depositions are 20 set forth in the document filed in the Court Docket herein as Document 163, filed 21 6/23/11, in Paragraph II). 22 3. Plaintiff also withdraws her Objections and Opposition to the discovery documents 23 described in paragraph I-1 (“12/14/10 Amended Response) and paragraph I-4 (11/30/10 24 Amended Responses) of Document 163. With respect to this Stipulation, the Parties have 25 26 agreed that non-responsive portions of such Responses, including the pro-forma objections will be redacted before use of such Responses. 27 28 Joint Stipulation and Order to Amend Pre-Trial Statement -- Case No. 09-01878-OWW-MSJ Page 2 1 4. Plaintiff has also agreed to withdraw her objection that Defendant failed to specify 2 specific portions of the Discovery Responses set forth in paragraphs 2, 5 and 6 of 3 Document 163, on the following condition: Defendant will specify any specific response 4 within those identified sets of discovery that it proposes to use, but the Parties agree that 5 Plaintiff reserves all rights to object to the specific content of any such newly specified 6 response, and to any foundational or substantive basis on which such response might be 7 8 excluded. DATED: June , 2011 IT IS SO STIPULATED and AGREED. 9 10 11 12 Robert E. Borton Elizabeth Kristen Sharon Terman The LEGAL AID SOCIETY --EMPLOYMENT LAW CENTER 13 14 By: ___ ___________ 15 16 Robert E. Borton Attorneys for Plaintiff 17 18 19 20 Carmine R. Zarlenga Maritoni D. Kane MAYER BROWN, LLP 21 22 23 24 25 26 Armand George Skol William A. Lapcevic Arata, Swingle, Sodhi & Van Egmond By_________________ William A. Lapcevic Attorneys for Defendant 27 28 Joint Stipulation and Order to Amend Pre-Trial Statement -- Case No. 09-01878-OWW-MSJ Page 3 1 2 3 4 ORDER 5 6 7 The Parties to this action having stipulated as set forth above to certain modifications of the trial- 8 related documents in this case, and to the Amendment of the JOINT EXHIBIT LIST to add an 9 additional Plaintiff’s Exhibit and, to the extent necessary to carry out his Stipulation and Order, 10 to the Amendment of the FINAL PRE-TRIAL ORDER, and the Parties having further stipulated 11 to the modification or withdrawal by Plaintiff of certain specified objections to the use of 12 Identified discovery documents, and 13 14 GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, it is hereby ORDERED that the contents of this Stipulation shall, 15 upon signing and entry of this document, become the ORDER of the Court. 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 Dated: 18 July 12, 2011 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: 19 20 emm0d64h 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Joint Stipulation and Order to Amend Pre-Trial Statement -- Case No. 09-01878-OWW-MSJ Page 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?