Escriba v. Foster Poultry Farms, Inc.
Filing
181
STIPULATION and ORDER Amending Pre-Trial Statement to Allow Additional Exhibit and to Withdraw/Modify Certain Objections, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 7/12/2011. (Kusamura, W)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Robert Borton, State Bar No. 53191
Elizabeth Kristen, State Bar No. 218227
Sharon Terman, State Bar No. 237236
THE LEGAL AID SOCIETY
EMPLOYMENT LAW CENTER
180 Montgomery Street, Suite 600
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 864-8848
Facsimile: (415) 593-0096
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Maria Escriba
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Armand George Skol, State Bar No. 058974
William A. Lapcevic, State Bar No. 238893
ARATA, SWINGLE, SODHI & VAN EGMOND
912 11TH Street, First Floor (95354)
Post Office Box 3287
Modesto, CA 95353
Telephone: (209) 522-2211
Facsimile: (209) 522-2980
Attorneys for Defendant
Foster Poultry Farms, A California Corporation
15
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
FRESNO DIVISION
18
19
MARIA ESCRIBA,
Plaintiff,
20
21
22
v.
FOSTER POULTRY FARMS,
A California Corporation,
23
24
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No.: 1:09-CV-01878-OWW-MJS
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER
AMENDING PRE-TRIAL
STATEMENT TO ALLOW
ADDITIONAL EXHIBIT AND TO
WITHDRAW/MODIFY CERTAIN
OBJECTIONS
TRIAL DATE: JULY 14, 2011
TIME: 9:00AM
COURTROOM 3
HONORABLE OLIVER WANGER
25
26
Plaintiff Maria Escriba and Defendant Foster Poultry Farms submit the following Joint
27
Stipulation and Proposed Order to request that, upon the parties’ agreement shown herein, the
28
Joint Stipulation and Order to Amend Pre-Trial Statement -- Case No. 09-01878-OWW-MSJ
Page 1
1
Court enter its Order in the proposed form set forth below. The purpose of this Stipulation and
2
Proposed Order is to allow the parties to modify the JOINT EXHIBIT LIST of trial exhibits to
3
add one additional Exhibit (and to amend the FINAL PRE-TRIAL ORDER accordingly), and
4
also to reflect the withdrawal or modification of objections to certain discovery documents and
5
deposition designations proposed by Defendant for use at trial.
Joint Stipulation
6
It is hereby stipulated between the Parties to this action, by and through their counsel of
7
8
9
10
11
12
record herein, that the Court is respectfully requested to enter the Proposed Order set forth
following this Stipulation, to allow certain agreed modifications to the trial documents that have
been submitted by the parties, and to amend, to the extent necessary, the Court’s FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER to allow such modifications. The agreed modifications are set forth in the
following paragraphs.
1. Plaintiff may amend its portion of the JOINT EXHIBIT LIST to add one additional
13
exhibit, consisting of five pages and identified as “Handwritten notes of John Dias dated
14
1/3/08 and 1/4/07(sic)”, such exhibit to be numbered Exhibit 123. The Court’s FINAL
15
PRE-TRIAL ORDER shall be deemed amended accordingly.
16
2.
Plaintiff withdraws her Objections and Opposition, based upon timeliness, to the
17
designation of the Depositions of Alfonso Flores and Carla Escriba. All other objections,
18
foundational or substantive, to the contents of those designated deposition excerpts, are
19
preserved. (For reference, Plaintiff’s Objections and Opposition to these depositions are
20
set forth in the document filed in the Court Docket herein as Document 163, filed
21
6/23/11, in Paragraph II).
22
3. Plaintiff also withdraws her Objections and Opposition to the discovery documents
23
described in paragraph I-1 (“12/14/10 Amended Response) and paragraph I-4 (11/30/10
24
Amended Responses) of Document 163. With respect to this Stipulation, the Parties have
25
26
agreed that non-responsive portions of such Responses, including the pro-forma
objections will be redacted before use of such Responses.
27
28
Joint Stipulation and Order to Amend Pre-Trial Statement -- Case No. 09-01878-OWW-MSJ
Page 2
1
4. Plaintiff has also agreed to withdraw her objection that Defendant failed to specify
2
specific portions of the Discovery Responses set forth in paragraphs 2, 5 and 6 of
3
Document 163, on the following condition: Defendant will specify any specific response
4
within those identified sets of discovery that it proposes to use, but the Parties agree that
5
Plaintiff reserves all rights to object to the specific content of any such newly specified
6
response, and to any foundational or substantive basis on which such response might be
7
8
excluded.
DATED: June , 2011
IT IS SO STIPULATED and AGREED.
9
10
11
12
Robert E. Borton
Elizabeth Kristen
Sharon Terman
The LEGAL AID SOCIETY
--EMPLOYMENT LAW CENTER
13
14
By: ___ ___________
15
16
Robert E. Borton
Attorneys for Plaintiff
17
18
19
20
Carmine R. Zarlenga
Maritoni D. Kane
MAYER BROWN, LLP
21
22
23
24
25
26
Armand George Skol
William A. Lapcevic
Arata, Swingle, Sodhi & Van Egmond
By_________________
William A. Lapcevic
Attorneys for Defendant
27
28
Joint Stipulation and Order to Amend Pre-Trial Statement -- Case No. 09-01878-OWW-MSJ
Page 3
1
2
3
4
ORDER
5
6
7
The Parties to this action having stipulated as set forth above to certain modifications of the trial-
8
related documents in this case, and to the Amendment of the JOINT EXHIBIT LIST to add an
9
additional Plaintiff’s Exhibit and, to the extent necessary to carry out his Stipulation and Order,
10
to the Amendment of the FINAL PRE-TRIAL ORDER, and the Parties having further stipulated
11
to the modification or withdrawal by Plaintiff of certain specified objections to the use of
12
Identified discovery documents, and
13
14
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, it is hereby ORDERED that the contents of this Stipulation shall,
15
upon signing and entry of this document, become the ORDER of the Court.
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
Dated:
18
July 12, 2011
/s/ Oliver W. Wanger
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
19
20
emm0d64h
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Joint Stipulation and Order to Amend Pre-Trial Statement -- Case No. 09-01878-OWW-MSJ
Page 4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?