Anderson v. Hansen et al
Filing
71
ORDER REQUIRING Plaintiff to File Opposition to Defendant Hartley's Motion for Summary Judgment (Twenty-One Day Deadline); NOTICE and WARNING of Requirements for Opposing Defendant's Summary Judgment Motion, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 7/2/2013. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
IREN ANDERSON,
CASE No. 1:09-cv-01924-LJO-MJS (PC)
11
Plaintiff,
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE
OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT HARTLEY’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
12
13
v.
(ECF Nos. 62, 70)
14
RON D. HANSEN, et al.,
TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE
15
16
NOTICE AND WARNING OF
REQUIREMENTS FOR OPPOSING
DEFENDANT’S SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION
Defendants.
17
/
18
19
20
Plaintiff Iren Anderson, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
21
pauperis, filed this civil rights action on November 2, 2009 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §
22
1983. (ECF No. 1.) This matter proceeds on his second amended complaint (ECF No.
23
19) claims of excessive force against Defendant Hansen, failure to protect against
24
Defendant Hartley, and failure to intervene against Defendant Lewis. (ECF No. 20.)
25
Defendants Hansen, Hartley, and Lewis have answered. (ECF Nos. 25, 43.)
26
On January 9, 2013, Defendant Hartley filed a motion for summary judgment.
27
(ECF No. 62.) Plaintiff was required to file an opposition or a statement of
28
non-opposition by not later than April 22, 2013. (ECF No. 70.) The April 22, 2013
-1-
1
deadline has passed without Plaintiff responding or seeking an extension of time to do
2
so.
3
The Court will give Plaintiff one further opportunity to respond to the motion:
4
Plaintiff must file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendant Hartley’s
5
motion for summary judgment within twenty one (21) days from the date of service of
6
this order.
7
Pursuant to Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2012), Rand v. Rowland,
8
154 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 1998), and Klingele v.Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1988),
9
the Court hereby notifies Plaintiff of the following rights and requirements for opposing
10
11
12
13
the motion:
1.
Unless otherwise ordered, all motions for summary judgment are briefed
pursuant to Local Rule 230(l).
2.
Plaintiff is required to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition
14
to Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Local Rule 230(l). If Plaintiff fails to file
15
an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion, this action may be
16
dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to prosecute. The opposition or statement of
17
non-opposition must be filed not more twenty one (21) days from the date of service of
18
this order. Id.
19
3.
A motion for summary judgment is a request for judgment on some or all
20
of Plaintiff’s claims in favor of Defendant without trial. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a). Defendant’s
21
motion sets forth the facts which he contends are not reasonably subject to dispute and
22
that entitle him to judgment as a matter of law. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c). This is called the
23
statement of undisputed facts. Local Rule 260(a).
24
Plaintiff has the right to oppose a motion for summary judgment. To oppose the
25
motion, Plaintiff must show proof of his claims. Plaintiff may agree with the facts set
26
forth in Defendant’s motion but argue that Defendant is not entitled to judgment as a
27
matter of law. In the alternative, if Plaintiff does not agree with the facts set forth in
28
-2-
1
Defendant’s motion, he may show that Defendant’s facts are disputed in one or more of
2
the following ways: (1) Plaintiff may rely upon statements made under the penalty of
3
perjury in the complaint or the opposition if (a) the complaint or opposition shows that
4
Plaintiff has personal knowledge of the matters stated and (b) Plaintiff calls to the
5
Court’s attention those parts of the complaint or opposition upon which Plaintiff relies;
6
(2) Plaintiff may serve and file declarations setting forth the facts which Plaintiff believes
7
prove his claims;1 (3) Plaintiff may rely upon written records but Plaintiff must prove that
8
the records are what he claims they are;2 or (4) Plaintiff may rely upon all or any part of
9
the transcript of one or more depositions, answers to interrogatories, or admissions
10
obtained in this proceeding. Should Plaintiff fail to contradict Defendant’s motion with
11
declarations or other evidence, Defendant’s evidence will be taken as truth, and final
12
judgment may be entered without a full trial. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(e).
13
In opposing Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, Local Rule 260(b)
14
requires Plaintiff to reproduce Defendant’s itemized facts in the statement of undisputed
15
facts and admit those facts which are undisputed and deny those which are disputed. If
16
Plaintiff disputes (denies) a fact, Plaintiff must cite to the evidence used to support that
17
denial (e.g., pleading, declaration, deposition, interrogatory answer, admission, or other
18
document). Local Rule 260(b).
19
4.
If discovery has not yet been opened or if discovery is still open and
20
Plaintiff is not yet able to present facts to justify the opposition to the motion, the Court
21
will consider a request to postpone consideration of Defendant’s motion. Fed. R. Civ. P.
22
56(d). Any request to postpone consideration of Defendant’s motion for summary
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
A declaration is a written statement setting forth facts (1) which are admissible in evidence, (2)
which are based on the personal knowledge of the person giving the statement, and (3) to which the
person giving the statement is competent to testify. 28 U.S.C. § 1746; Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c)(4). A
declaration must be dated and signed under penalty of perjury as follows: “I declare (or certify, verify or
state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature).” 28
U.S.C. § 1746.
2
Sworn or certified copies of all papers referred to in the declaration must be included and served
on the opposing party. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(e).
-3-
1
judgment must include the following: (1) a declaration setting forth the specific facts
2
Plaintiff hopes to elicit from further discovery, (2) a showing that the facts exist, and (3)
3
a showing that the facts are essential to opposing the motion for summary judgment.
4
Blough v. Holland Realty, Inc., 574 F.3d 1084, 1091 n.5 (9th Cir. 2009); Tatum v. City
5
and County of San Francisco, 441 F.3d 1090, 1100-01 (9th Cir. 2006); State of
6
California v. Campbell, 138 F.3d 772, 779 (9th Cir. 1998). The request to postpone the
7
motion for summary judgment must identify what information is sought and how it would
8
preclude summary judgment. Blough, 574 F.3d at 1091 n.5; Tatum, 441 F.3d at
9
1100-01; Margolis v. Ryan, 140 F.3d 850, 853 (9th Cir. 1998); Local Rule 260(b).
5.
10
11
Unsigned declarations will be stricken, and declarations not signed under
penalty of perjury have no evidentiary value.
6.
12
The failure of any party to comply with this Order, the Federal Rules of
13
Civil Procedure, or the Local Rules of the Eastern District of California may result in the
14
imposition of sanctions including but not limited to dismissal of the action or entry of
15
default.
16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
18
Dated:
ci4d6
July 2, 2013
Michael J. Seng
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?