David Laughing Horse Robinson et al v. U.S. Department of Interior et al

Filing 209

ORDER re clarification of the Court's Order to Dismiss, document 205 , signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 2/10/2012. (Rooney, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 DAVID LAUGHING HORSE ROBINSON, ET AL. CASE NO. 09-cv-01977-BAM 11 ORDER RE CLARIFICATION OF COURT’S ORDER TO DISMISS (Doc. 205) Plaintiffs, 12 vs. 13 14 KEN SALAZAR, ET AL., 15 Defendants. / 16 17 On February 7, 2012, plaintiffs filed an ex parte request for clarification of this Court’s Order 18 on Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss. (Doc. 205). In the Court’s Order, the Court dismissed plaintiffs’ 19 California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) claim, among other claims. Plaintiffs seek clarification 20 of whether the CEQA claim was dismissed without prejudice or with prejudice to filing the claim in state 21 court. 22 As to the CEQA claim, the Court’s Order stated: 23 “The Court GRANTS the motions to dismiss without leave to amend as to the Fourth Claim for Relief for Violation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and Govt. Code 65352.3 against Kern, TRC and TMV.” 24 25 26 The Court clarifies its Order as follows. The Court dismissed without leave to amend these claims in 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 1 the current action before this Court. The Court dismissed on jurisdictional grounds. The Court did not 2 reach the merits of the claims and did not dismiss these claims with prejudice to refiling in an 3 appropriate forum, where it would be subject to any of defendants’ defenses. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 10c20k February 10, 2012 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?