Stanislaus Custodial Deputy Sheriffs' Association v. Deputy Sheriff's Association of Stanislaus County et al

Filing 47

STIPULATION and ORDER Modifying Scheduling Order: Expert Disclosure by 6/13/2011; Supplemental Expert Disclosure by 6/26/2011. signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 5/26/2011. (Herman, H)

1
2
3
4
5

CHRISTOPHER W. MILLER, ESQ. (SBN 166348)
ISAAC S. STEVENS, ESQ. (SBN 251245)
MASTAGNI, HOLSTEDT, AMICK,
MILLER & JOHNSEN
A Professional Corporation
1912 “I” Street
Sacramento, California 95811-3151
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

6
7
8

Attorneys for Defendants
Deputy Sheriff’s Assn. of Stanislaus County,
Stanislaus Sworn Deputies Assn.; and
Vince Bizzini

9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12
13

STANISLAUS CUSTODIAL DEPUTY
SHERIFF’S ASSOCIATION dba Stanislaus
County Deputy Sheriffs’ Association,

14
15
16
17
18
19

Plaintiff,
v.
DEPUTY SHERIFF’S ASSOCIATION OF
STANISLAUS COUNTY; VINCE
BIZZINI; STANISLAUS SWORN
DEPUTIES ASSOCIATION; and DOES 110, INCLUSIVE,
Defendants.
____________________________________

20
21

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS
____________________________________

22
23
24
25
26

) Case No.: 1:09-cv-01988-LJO-SMS
)
) STIPULATION AND ORDER
) MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

STIPULATION
WHEREAS, the Court’s Scheduling Order (Docket No. 43) currently requires the parties to
disclose their expert witnesses on May 27, 2011;
WHEREAS, the Court’s Scheduling Order currently requires the parties to exchange
supplemental expert disclosure on June 13, 2011;

27

WHEREAS, the parties have engaged in extensive settlement discussions in this matter;

28

WHEREAS, the parties are currently negotiating the language of a proposed settlement
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER

SCDSA v. DSASC, et al.
Case No.: 1:09-cv-01988-LJ0-SMS

1

agreement;

2

WHEREAS, the parties wish to avoid incurring potentially unnecessary costs and attorney

3

time in preparing expert witness disclosures while negotiating the proposed settlement agreement;

4

WHEREAS, the parties agree that an order modifying the Court Scheduling Order to

5

postpone expert witness disclosure to June 13, 2011 will allow the parties time to finish negotiating

6

the terms of the proposed settlement;

7

WHEREAS, the parties agree that an order modifying the Court Scheduling Order to

8

postpone supplemental expert witness disclosure to June 26, 2011 will allow the parties time to

9

finish negotiating the terms of the proposed settlement;

10

THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate that the good cause exists to extend the deadline

11

for disclosing expert witnesses to June 13, 2011 and deadline for completing supplemental expert

12

disclosure to June 26, 2011;

13

THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate that the deadline to disclose expert witnesses in

14

this case be extended to June 13, 2011 and the deadline for supplemental expert disclosure be

15

extended to June 26, 2011.

16
17
18

DATED: May 25, 2011

MASTAGNI, HOLSTEDT, AMICK,
MILLER & JOHNSEN, A.P.C.

19
20

/s/ Isaac S. Stevens
ISAAC S. STEVENS
Attorneys for Defendants

21
22

DATED: May 25, 2011

MENNEMEIER, GLASSMAN & STROUD LLP

23
/s/ Sarah J. Fischer
SARAH J. FISCHER
Attorneys for Plaintiff

24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER

2

SCDSA v. DSASC, et al.
Case No.: 1:09-cv-01988-LJ0-SMS

1

ORDER

2

Good cause appearing, it is hereby ORDERED that the deadline to disclose expert witnesses

3

in this case be extended to June 13, 2011 and the deadline for completing supplemental expert

4

disclosure be extended to June 26, 2011.

5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7

Dated:

May 26, 2011

/s/ Sandra M. Snyder
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER

3

SCDSA v. DSASC, et al.
Case No.: 1:09-cv-01988-LJ0-SMS