Rotroff v. Ahlin et al
Filing
31
ORDER Requiring Plaintiff To File Opposition Or Statement Of Non-Opposition To Defendants' Motion To Dismiss Within Thirty Days (Doc. 24 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 5/20/2010. (Opposition due by 6/23/2010) (Scrivner, E)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 6i0kij 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: On April 16, 2010, defendants Pam Ahlin and Stephen W. Mayberg ("Defendants") filed a motion to dismiss. (Doc. 24.) Plaintiff was required to file an opposition or a statement of nonopposition to the motion within twenty-one days, but has not done so. Local Rule 230(l). Accordingly, within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff must file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendants' motion to dismiss. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order, this action will be dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to obey the Court's order and failure to prosecute. v. PAM AHLIN, et al., (Doc. 24.) Defendants. / DENIS K. ROTROFF, Plaintiff, 1:09-cv-02021-AWI-GSA-PC ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NONOPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS WITHIN THIRTY DAYS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 20, 2010
/s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
