Buchanan v. Clark et al
Filing
18
ORDER ADOPTING 17 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ORDERED that Plaintiff is permitted to proceed on his Eighth Amendment claim that Defendants Clark and Erickson used excessive force and all Plaintiff's remaining claims are DISMISSED without prejudice, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 02/02/2012. (Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
WHITTIER BUCHANAN,
Plaintiff,
10
v.
11
12
G. CLARK, et al.,
1:09-cv-02029-LJO-MJS (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING
CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS
(ECF No. 17)
Defendants.
13
14
15
_______________________________/
16
17
Plaintiff Whittier Buchanan (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
18
pauperis in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred
19
to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule
20
302.
21
On November 22, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and
22
Recommendation, recommending dismissal of certain of Plaintiff’s claims and
23
defendants. (ECF No. 17.) Plaintiff has failed to file objections to the Findings and
24
Recommendation.
25
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c) and Local Rule 305,
26
this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the
27
entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the
28
record and by proper analysis.
///
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
The Findings and Recommendations, filed November 22, 2011, are adopted
2.
Plaintiff is permitted to proceed on his Eighth Amendment claim that
3
in full;
4
5
Defendants Clark and Erickson used excessive force; and
3.
6
All of Plaintiff’s remaining claims are DISMISSED without prejudice.
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
Dated:
b9ed48
February 2, 2012
/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?