Buchanan v. Clark et al

Filing 30

ORDER ADOPTING 26 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and DENYING 22 Defendant's Motion to Revoke Plaintiff's In Forma Pauperis Status signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 8/21/2012. (Jessen, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10
11

WHITTIER BUCHANAN,

12
Plaintiff,

13
14
15

v.

18

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO REVOKE
PLAINTIFF’S IN FORMA PAUPERIS
STATUS

G. CLARK, et al.,
(ECF Nos. 22 & 26)

16
17

1:09-cv-02029-LJO-MJS (PC)

Defendants.
___________________________________/

19

Plaintiff Whittier Buchanan (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil

20

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

21

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

22
23

On June 14, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations,

24

recommending that Defendant Clark’s motion to revoke Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status be

25

denied. (ECF No. 26.) The parties have not filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations.

26

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c) and Local Rule 305, this

27
28

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

1
2

Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
analysis.

3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
4
5

1.

The Findings and Recommendations, filed June 14, 2012, are adopted in full; and

6

2.

Defendant Clark’s motion to revoke Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status (ECF No.

7

22) is DENIED.

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
b9ed48

August 21, 2012

/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE