Frey v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 13

STIPULATION and ORDER for REMAND Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g), and for Entry of Judgment in Favor of Plaintiff and Against Defendant, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 6/28/2010. CASE CLOSED. (Jessen, A)

(SS) Frey v. Commissioner of Social Security

Doc. 13

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration LESLIE ALEXANDER (CSBN 256624) Special Assistant United States Attorney 333 Market Street, Suite 1500 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] E-Mail: [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendant UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION

GARY FREY,

) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, ) Commissioner of ) Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) _________________________________)

CIVIL NO. 1:09-CV-02037-DLB STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR REMAND PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST DEFENDANT

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that this action be remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further administrative action pursuant to section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), sentence four. On remand, the Appeals Counsel will instruct the Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") to take the following action: 1. Clarify the finding that the claimant is limited to "low stress jobs"; 2. Re-contact Charles House, Ph.D., to obtain updated treatment records and any additional documentation in support of his prior opinion;

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3b142a file.

3. Further develop the medical record regarding the claimant's mental impairment and headaches by obtaining any needed consultative examinations and/or medical expert testimony; 4. Obtain any needed vocational expert testimony; 5. Clarify the weight given to the claimant's wife's statement; and, 6. Associate the subsequent claim filed on November 20, 2009, and consider the evidence in that

The parties stipulate that no specific aspect of the ALJ's prior decision is affirmed. The parties further request that the Clerk of the Court be directed to enter a final judgment in favor of Plaintiff, and against Defendant, Commissioner of Social Security, reversing the final decision of the Commissioner. Nothing in this proposed order shall be taken to affect Plaintiff's right to request Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) attorney's fees under 28 U.S.C. § 2412, or costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920, or to prevent Defendant from opposing any such requests. Respectfully submitted, Dated: June 28, 2010 s/ Sengthiene Bosavanh (As authorized by email) SENGTHIENE BOSAVANH Attorney for Plaintiff BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney By s/ Leslie Alexander LESLIE ALEXANDER Special Assistant U. S. Attorney Attorneys for Defendant

Date: June 28, 2010

ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated:

June 28, 2010

/s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2