Taelieniu Faatiliga v. Hartley

Filing 16

ORDER Directing Respondent to File Answer to Petition to Within 45 Days from the Date of Service of this Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 4/23/2010. ( Response due by 6/10/2010.) (Sondheim, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 TAELIENIU FAATILIGA, 7 Petitioner, 8 v. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 3b142a 28 1 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner filed the instant petition for writ of habeas corpus on November 20, 2009. (Court Doc. 1.) On January 29, 2010, Respondent filed a motion to dismiss one of the claims from the petition as untimely. (Court Doc. 11.) Petitioner filed an opposition and Respondent filed a reply. (Court Docs. 12, 13.) On March 1, 2010, the undersigned issued Findings and Recommendations to deny Respondent's motion to dismiss. (Court Doc. 14.) On April 21, 2010, the Findings and Recommendation was adopted in full and the matter was referred back to the undersigned for further proceedings. (Court Doc. 15.) Within forty-five (45) days from the date of service of this order, Respondent is directed to file an answer to the petition. All of the provisions of the Court's December 2, 2009, remain in full force and effect. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: JAMES D. HARTLEY, Respondent. / ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO FILE ANSWER TO PETITION WITHIN FORTYFIVE (45) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SERVICE OF THIS ORDER 1:09-cv-02039-LJO-DLB (HC) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA April 23, 2010 /s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?