Crim v. Management & Training Corp. et al

Filing 107

ORDER DENYING 104 Request to Use Electronic Filing, Without Prejudice signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 8/20/2017. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN MICHAEL CRIM, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 v. 1:09-cv-02041-AWI-GSA-PC ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO USE ELECTRONIC FILING, WITHOUT PREJUDICE (ECF No. 97.) MANAGEMENT & TRAINING CORP., et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 John Michael Crim (“Plaintiff”) is a former federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in 20 forma pauperis with this civil action. This case was dismissed on July 21, 2017, for Plaintiff’s 21 failure to comply with a court order. (ECF No. 100.) On July 24, 2017, Plaintiff filed a motion 22 for permission to file documents electronically, using the court’s electronic filing system 23 (ECF). (ECF No. 104.) 24 Under Local Rule 133, “Any person appearing pro se may not utilize electronic filing 25 except with the permission of the assigned Judge or Magistrate Judge. All pro se parties shall 26 file and serve paper documents as required by applicable Federal Rules of Civil or Criminal 27 Procedure or by these Rules.” L.R. 133(b)(3). Pro se parties seeking leave to file documents 28 electronically must “submit requests as stipulations as provided in L.R. 143 or, if a stipulation 1 1 cannot be had, as written motions setting out an explanation of reasons for the exception. 2 Points and authorities are not required, and no argument or hearing will normally be held. 3 Requests may also be made in scheduling conference and pretrial conference statements when 4 the need can be foreseen.” L.R. 133(b)(3). 5 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se in this action, has filed a motion in which he 6 “requests this Court to grant him permission to file electronically with the ECF system.” (ECF 7 No. 104.) However, Plaintiff has not set out any explanation of the reasons the court should 8 allow him to file documents electronically. Therefore, Plaintiff’s motion must be denied, 9 without prejudice to renewing the motion. 10 11 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for permission to file documents electronically, filed on July 24, 2017, is DENIED without prejudice. 12 13 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 20, 2017 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?