Crim v. Management & Training Corp. et al

Filing 70

ORDER for Plaintiff to Notify Court of His Intentions in Submitting Two Complaints, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 6/25/2012. 30-day deadline. (Jessen, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

JOHN MICHAEL CRIM,

11
12
13

1:09-cv-02041-AWI-GSA-PC

Plaintiff,

ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO NOTIFY
COURT OF HIS INTENTIONS IN
SUBMITTING TWO COMPLAINTS

v.
MANAGEMENT & TRAINING
CORP., et al.,

THIRTY DAY DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSE

14
Defendants.
15
/
16
17

John Michael Crim (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this

18

civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). On June 14, 2012,

19

the Court issued an order requiring Plaintiff to file a Third Amended Complaint pursuant to the Court’s

20

order of May 25, 2012. (Doc. 64.) On June 18, 2012, Plaintiff submitted a Complaint against

21

defendants Mann and Patrick, which was lodged in the present action. (Doc. 67.) On June 19, 2012,

22

Plaintiff submitted a Third Amended Complaint against defendants Management & Training Corp.,

23

Adler, Stewart, and Logan, which was also lodged in the present action. (Doc. 68.)

24

Plaintiff may not proceed with both complaints in the present action. Plaintiff may have intended

25

the Court to file the Third Amended Complaint in the present action, and to open a new civil rights

26

action with the Complaint. Plaintiff shall be required to clarify his intentions by filing a written response

27

to this order within thirty days.

28

1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1.

Within thirty days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall file a written

3

response, clarifying his intentions in submitting two complaints, (1) a Third Amended

4

Complaint against defendants Management & Training Corp., Adler, Stewart, and Logan,

5

and (2) a Complaint against defendants Mann and Patrick; and

6

2.

7

Plaintiff’s failure to comply with this order shall result in a recommendation that this
action be dismissed.

8
9

IT IS SO ORDERED.

10

Dated:
6i0kij

June 25, 2012

/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2