Ingram v. Ethridge et al

Filing 22

ORDER GRANTING a THIRTY-DAY Extension of Time to File a Response to the Complaint 21 , signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 8/26/11: Defendant Ethridge is GRANTED a thirty-day extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's complaint. (Hellings, J)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

TYRONE INGRAM,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

vs.
ETHRIDGE,

1:09-cv-02048-SKO (PC)
ORDER GRANTING A THIRTY-DAY
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A
RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT
(Document #21)

15

Defendant.

16

________________________________/

17

30-DAY DEADLINE

On August 24, 2011, non-party California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

18

made a limited appearance to respond to the Court’s order to show cause and request that

19

Defendant Ethridge be granted a thirty-day extension of time to file a response to Plaintiff’s

20

complaint.

21
22

Good cause having been shown, Defendant Ethridge is HEREBY GRANTED a thirtyday extension of time to respond to Plaintiff’s complaint.

23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25

Dated:
i0d3h8

26
27
28

August 26, 2011

/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE