William D. Johns v. MTC Distributing et al
Filing
38
STIPULATION To Dismiss Entire Action With Prejudice, And ORDER Thereon, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 4/1/2011. CASE CLOSED.(Fahrney, E)
William D. Johns v. MTC Distributing et al
Doc. 38
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
MICHAEL B. IJAMS (Bar No. 084150) CURTIS LEGAL GROUP A Professional Law Corporation 1300 K Street, Second Floor (95354) P.O. Box 3030 Modesto, CA 95353 (209) 521-1800; (209) 572-3501 FAX mijams@curtislegalgroup.com Attorneys for Defendants MTC DISTRIBUTING, a California corporation, and THOMAS EAKIN, an individual UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION
WILLIAM D. JOHNS, Plaintiff, v. MTC DISTRIBUTING, INC., a California corporation, THOMAS EAKIN, an individual, Defendants. /
Case No. 1:09-CV-02073-LJO-GSA STIPULATION TO DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE, AND ORDER THEREON
STIPULATION All parties to this action hereby stipulate, by and through their attorneys of record, that the entire action, including both the operative complaint of William D. Johns and the counterclaim of MTC Distributing, be dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear his or its own attorneys fees and costs. LAW OFFICES OF CHADWICK J. BRADBURY
DATED:
3/23/2011
By
/s/ Chadwick J. Bradbury CHADWICK J. BRADBURY Attorney for Plaintiff WILLIAM D. JOHNS
STIPULATION TO DISM ISS ENTIRE ACTION W ITH PREJUDICE, AND ORDER THEREON
Dockets.Justia.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: 3/31/11
CURTIS LEGAL GROUP A Professional Law Corporation
By
/s/ Michael B. Ijams MICHAEL B. IJAMS Attorneys for Defendants MTC DISTRIBUTING and THOMAS EAKIN
ORDER The clerk is directed to close this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 66h44d April 1, 2011 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
STIPULATION TO DISM ISS ENTIRE ACTION W ITH PREJUDICE, AND ORDER THEREON
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?