Quiroz v. Reynoso et al
Filing
7
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why This Action Should Not Be Dismissed For Failure to Obey a Court Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 4/19/10: Plaintiff's Show Cause Response due by 5/12/2010.(Hellings, J)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 77e0d6 25 26 27 28 1 On February 24, 2010, the court issued an order granting an extension of time to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis, within thirty (30) days. The thirty (30)-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed a an application to proceed in forma pauperis or otherwise responded to the court's order. Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to obey a court order. Plaintiff is to file a response within twenty (20) days from the date of service of this order. Failure to respond to this order will result in dismissal of this action for failure to obey a court order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: v. J. REYNOSO, et al., Defendants. / JOAQUIN RAMON QUIROZ, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 1:09-cv-02193-DLB PC ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO OBEY A COURT ORDER (Doc. 1) RESPONSE DUE WITHIN 20 DAYS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
April 19, 2010
/s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
