Lamon v. Cate et al

Filing 29

ORDER DENYING Pending Motions as MOOT and DIRECTING Clerk of the Court to CLOSE this CASE Pursuant to Plaintiff's 28 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 9/29/2011. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 BARRY LOUIS LAMON, 10 Plaintiff, 11 12 CASE NO. 1:09-cv-02220-LJO-SKO PC ORDER DENYING PENDING MOTIONS AS MOOT AND DIRECTING CLERK OF THE COURT TO CLOSE THIS CASE PURSUANT TO PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL v. MATTHEW L. CATE, et al., 13 Defendants. (Docs. 25, 26, and 28) / 14 15 On September 26, 2011, Plaintiff Barry Louis Lamon filed a notice of voluntary dismissal 16 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(i). At this stage in the proceedings, Plaintiff 17 has the absolute right to dismiss his claims, without prejudice. Duke Energy Trading and Marketing, 18 L.L.C. v. Davis, 267 F.3d 1042, 1049 (9th Cir. 2001). The filing of the notice itself has the effect 19 of closing the action, and the Court no longer has jurisdiction over the claims. Id. 20 Accordingly, all pending motions are DENIED as moot and the Clerk of the Court is 21 DIRECTED to close this file pursuant to Plaintiff’s notice of voluntary dismissal filed on September 22 26, 2011. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: b9ed48 September 29, 2011 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?