Lamon v. Cate et al
Filing
29
ORDER DENYING Pending Motions as MOOT and DIRECTING Clerk of the Court to CLOSE this CASE Pursuant to Plaintiff's 28 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 9/29/2011. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
BARRY LOUIS LAMON,
10
Plaintiff,
11
12
CASE NO. 1:09-cv-02220-LJO-SKO PC
ORDER DENYING PENDING MOTIONS AS
MOOT AND DIRECTING CLERK OF THE
COURT TO CLOSE THIS CASE PURSUANT
TO PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY
DISMISSAL
v.
MATTHEW L. CATE, et al.,
13
Defendants.
(Docs. 25, 26, and 28)
/
14
15
On September 26, 2011, Plaintiff Barry Louis Lamon filed a notice of voluntary dismissal
16
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(i). At this stage in the proceedings, Plaintiff
17
has the absolute right to dismiss his claims, without prejudice. Duke Energy Trading and Marketing,
18
L.L.C. v. Davis, 267 F.3d 1042, 1049 (9th Cir. 2001). The filing of the notice itself has the effect
19
of closing the action, and the Court no longer has jurisdiction over the claims. Id.
20
Accordingly, all pending motions are DENIED as moot and the Clerk of the Court is
21
DIRECTED to close this file pursuant to Plaintiff’s notice of voluntary dismissal filed on September
22
26, 2011.
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
Dated:
b9ed48
September 29, 2011
/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
26
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?