Blackman v. Harrington et al

Filing 4

ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis and Requiring Plaintiff to Pay $350.00 Filing Fee in Full Within 15 Days or Case Will be Dismissed, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 1/8/2010. Filing Fee due by 1/25/2010. (Sondheim, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Defendants. 16 _________________________________/ 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff Tony Blackman ("plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on December 24, 2009, along with an application to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Doc. 1.) 28 U.S.C. § 1915 governs proceedings in forma pauperis. Section 1915(g) provides that "[i]n no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action . . . under this section if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury." A review of the actions filed by plaintiff reveals that plaintiff is subject to 28 /// 1 (Doc. 1.) v. KLIEWER, et al., TONY BLACKMAN, Plaintiff, 1:09-cv-02233-OWW-GSA-PC ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO PAY THE $350.00 FILING FEE IN FULL WITHIN 15 DAYS OR CASE WILL BE DISMISSED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and is precluded from proceeding in forma pauperis unless plaintiff is, at the time the complaint is filed, under imminent danger of serious physical injury.1 Plaintiff alleges in the complaint that his rights to due process have been violated because he has been denied written decisions on his prison appeals, a copy of his trust account statement, and access to the law library so he can challenge his "false imprisonment." The Court has reviewed plaintiff's complaint and finds that plaintiff has alleged no facts that support a finding that he is, at this time, under imminent danger of serious physical injury. Accordingly, plaintiff may not proceed in forma pauperis in this action, and must submit the appropriate filing fee in order to proceed with this action. Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis in this action is denied; 2. Plaintiff shall pay the $350.00 filing fee in full within fifteen (15) days from the date of service of this order; and 3. If plaintiff fails to pay the $350.00 filing fee in full within fifteen days, this action shall be dismissed, without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 8, 2010 emm0d6 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE T h e Court takes judicial notice of four prior civil actions brought by plaintiff challenging the conditions of his c o n fin e m e n t. All four actions were dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim upon which relief may b e granted. Blackman v. Hartwell, et al.,1:99-cv-05822-REC-HGB-P (Eastern District of California ("CAED"); dismissed March 12, 2001); 3:05-cv-05390-SI Blackman v. Medina (Northern District of California ("CAND"); dismissed March 13, 2006); 3:06-cv-06398SI Blackman v. Variz (CAND; dismissed December 18, 2006); and 1:04-cv-06389-AWI-NEW(DLB)- PC Blackman v. Taxdahl (CAED; dismissed May 18, 2007). 1 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?