Rocky Mountain Farmers Union et al v. Corey, et al

Filing 109

ORDER GRANTING plaintiffs' request to exceed page limit requirements in re the filing of motions for summary judgment, documents #107 and #108 ; order signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 10/29/2010. (Rooney, M)

Download PDF
Rocky Mountain Farmers Union et al v. Goldstene Doc. 109 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Plaintiffs, 13 vs. 14 JAMES GOLDSTENE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: / Plaintiffs seek leave to exceed this Court's briefing limits. This Court treats briefs in excess of page limits as a necessity, not a luxury to be taken lightly. This Court PERMITS plaintiffs to file opening briefs not to exceed 35 pages on the condition that such briefs are well-organized, clear and succinct and avoid unnecessary duplication. All other briefing shall conform to the Standing Order page limitations of this Court, unless this Court orders otherwise. In addition, this Court ORDERS the parties to provide courtesy copies of their papers to chambers. Due to this Court's heavy caseload and its effect to hold to scheduled trial and related dates, the parties are encouraged to consider consent to the conduct of further proceedings by a United States Magistrate Judge. IT IS SO ORDERED. October 29, 2010 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill 1 ORDER ON BRIEFING PAGE LIMITS (Docs. 107, 108.) ROCKY MOUNTAIN FARMERS, UNION, et al., CASE NO. CV F 09-2234 LJO DLB IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 66h44d UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?