Rocky Mountain Farmers Union et al v. Corey, et al
Filing
397
ORDER on Unopposed Rule 41(a) #395 Motion to Dismiss Remaining Claims signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 8/14/2017. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
WANGER JONES HELSLEY PC
265 E. River Park Circle, Suite 310
Post Office Box 28340
Fresno, California 93720
Telephone: (559) 233-4800
Facsimile: (559) 233-9330
4
5
Timothy Jones #119841
John P. Kinsey #215916
6
Attorneys for:
7
8
9
All Plaintiffs in Case No.
1:09-cv-02234-LJO-BAM
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
655 15th Street, N.W., Suite 1200
Washington, D.C. 20005
Telephone: (202) 879-5000
Facsimile: (202) 879-5200
10
11
Stuart A. C. Drake, pro hac vice
John C. O’Quinn, pro hac vice
12
Attorneys for: Plaintiff Growth Energy
13
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
FRESNO DIVISION
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
ROCKY MOUNTAIN FARMERS UNION,
et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Consolidated With Case No.
1:10-cv-00163-LJO-BAM
v.
ORDER ON UNOPPOSED RULE 41(a)
RICHARD W. COREY, in his official
MOTION TO DISMISS REMAINING
capacity as Executive Officer of the
CLAIMS
CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD,
et al.,
Defendants
.
24
25
LEAD CASE NO.
1:09-cv-02234-LJO-BAM
and Related Consolidated Action.
26
27
28
{7011/005/00747362.DOC}
ORDER ON UNOPPOSED RULE 41(a) MOTION TO DISMISS REMAINING CLAIMS
(1:09-cv-02234-LJO-BAM)
1
Upon consideration of the Unopposed Rule 41(a) Motion to Dismiss Remaining Claims,
2
presented by Plaintiffs Rocky Mountain Farmers Union, Redwood County Minnesota Corn And
3
Soybeans Growers, Penny Newman Grain, Inc., Fresno County Farm Bureau, Nisei Farmers
4
League, California Dairy Campaign, Rex Nederend, and Growth Energy in Case No. 1:09-cv-
5
02234-LJO-BAM, as well as this Court’s June 16, 2017 Memorandum Decision, and the other
6
proceedings in this case, it is hereby ORDERED:
7
8
1.
Plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss the claims that remain pending in this Court, which
were not dismissed in this Court’s June 16, 2017 Memorandum Decision is granted.
9
2.
The clerk will enter a final judgment.
10
3.
The dismissal of the claims that remained pending is without prejudice to
11
Plaintiffs’ appellate rights in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and the Supreme
12
Court, as to all other claims adjudicated in this proceeding.
13
4.
Each party shall bear its own costs.
14
15
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
August 14, 2017
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____
UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Unopposed Rule 41(a) Motion to Dismissal Remaining Claims
{7011/005/00747362.DOC}
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?