Rocky Mountain Farmers Union et al v. Goldstene

Filing 90

STIPULATION and ORDER to continue the Scheduling Conference from 7/28/2010 to 9/9/2010 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (DLB) before Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 7/22/2010. (Hernandez, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JONES HELSLEY PC 8365 N. Fresno Street, Suite 310 Post Office Box 28340 Fresno, California 93729 Telephone: (559) 233-4800 Facsimile: (559) 233-9330 Timothy Jones #119841 John P. Kinsey #215916 Attorneys for: Plaintiffs Rocky Mountain Farmers Union; Redwood County Minnesota Corn And Soybeans Growers; Penny Newman Grain, Inc.; Fresno County Farm Bureau; Nisei Farmers League; California Dairy Campaign; Rex Nederend; Growth Energy and the Renewable Fuels Association UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ROCKY MOUNTAIN FARMERS UNION; et al., Plaintiffs, v. JAMES N. GOLDSTENE, Defendant. NATIONAL PETROCHEMICAL & REFINERS ASSOCIATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. JAMES GOLDSTENE, et al., Defendants And related intervenor actions Case No. 1:09-CV-02234-LJO-DLB STIPULATION AND ORDER TO FURTHER CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE Related with Case No.: 1:10-CV-00163-LJO-DLB /// /// /// {7011/005/00252404.DOC} 1 ________________________________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FURTHER CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS the Mandatory Scheduling Conferences scheduled in the related actions of Rocky Mountain Farmers Union, et al. v. Goldstene, Case No. 1:09-CV-02234-LJODLB (the "RMFU Action"), and National Petrochemical & Refiners Association, et al. v. Goldstene, et al., Case No. 1:10-CV-00163-LJO-DLB (the "NPRA Action") are presently set for July 28, 2010, in Courtroom No. 9, at 9:00 a.m. and 9:15 a.m. WHEREAS the Defendants in the RMFU Action and the NPRA Action recently filed their Answers on July 14, 2010. WHEREAS both the Plaintiffs in RMFU and NPRA Actions and Defendants have agreed to stipulate to continue the Mandatory Scheduling Conferences in the above actions, to provide the parties additional time to meet and confer regarding their Joint Scheduling Conference Statements. WHEREAS additional time to meet and confer regarding the Joint Scheduling Conference Statements is necessary to allow the parties to further discuss which facts and/or legal issues in the above actions are disputed or undisputed. WHEREAS all parties are available to conduct the Mandatory Scheduling Conferences in these actions on September 9, 2010, and have agreed to hold it on this date, pending approval by the Court. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiffs in both actions and Defendants, by and through their respective counsel, that: 1. The Mandatory Scheduling Conferences in the above-captioned actions, previously scheduled for July 28, 2010, should be continued to September 9, 2010, at 9:00 a.m., or such time as may be set by the Court, in Courtroom 9 (6th Floor). 2. The parties shall serve their initial disclosures under Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure no later than 14 days following the September 9, 2010, Mandatory Scheduling Conferences. /// /// /// {7011/005/00252404.DOC} 2 ________________________________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FURTHER CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Dated: July 16, 2010 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE By: /s/ Mark Poole Mark Poole, Attorneys for All Defendants Dated: July 22, 2010 SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP By: /s/ Marie C. Fiala Marie C. Fiala, Attorneys for the NPRA Plaintiffs Dated: July 22, 2010 JONES HELSLEY PC By: /s/ John P. Kinsey John P. Kinsey, Attorneys for the RMFU Plaintiffs ORDER The Court having reviewed the foregoing Stipulation, and good cause appearing therefor: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Mandatory Scheduling Conferences in the above-captioned actions, previously scheduled for July 28, 2010, shall be continued to September 9, 2010, at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 9 (6th Floor). IT IS ALSO ORDERED that the parties shall serve their initial disclosures under Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure no later than 14 days following the September 9, 2010, Mandatory Scheduling Conferences. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: DEAC_Signature-END: July 22, 2010 /s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 3b142a {7011/005/00252404.DOC} 28 3 ________________________________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FURTHER CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?