Hughes v. City of Mariposa et al

Filing 35

ORDER DENYING Motions 33 & 34 , signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 12/17/2010. (Marrujo, C)

(PC) Hughes v. City of Mariposa et al

Doc. 35

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff Bernard C. Hughes ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 14, 2010, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting a fourteen day extension of time to file an amended complaint as well as a motion requesting a copy of the court's file for this case. (Docs. #33, 34.) The Court provided Plaintiff with a thirty day extension of time to file his amended complaint on December 9, 2010. (Doc. #32.) Since the extension was granted so recently, the Court will not grant Plaintiff another extension at this time. Plaintiff may file another request for an extension of the deadline when the deadline is more imminent, but Plaintiff must persuasively demonstrate why he is unable to meet the deadline. Plaintiff's second motion requests a copy of the court file. Plaintiff claims that he did not receive his paperwork from his attorney. Plaintiff is advised that the Court does not provide copying services for litigants. Copies of documents may be obtained from the court file by contacting Attorney's Diversified Services at 741 N. Fulton Street, Fresno, California 93728, 800-842-2695. /// 1
Dockets.Justia.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

BERNARD C. HUGHES, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MARIPOSA, et al., Defendants. /

CASE NO. 1:09-cv-02249-SKO PC ORDER DENYING MOTIONS (Docs. 33, 34)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. 2. Plaintiff's request for an extension of time is DENIED; and Plaintiff's request for a copy of the court file is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 0mee December 17, 2010 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2