Hughes v. City of Mariposa et al

Filing 58

ORDER Directing Clerk to Re-Serve Second Informational Order with RAND Notice Upon Plaintiff, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 7/9/12. (Verduzco, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10
11
12
13
14
15

BERNARD C. HUGHES,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
CITY OF MARIPOSA, et al.,
)
)
)
Defendants.
)
____________________________________)

1:09-cv-02249-GSA-PC
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO RESERVE SECOND INFORMATIONAL
ORDER WITH RAND NOTICE UPON
PLAINTIFF
(Doc. 52-1.)

16

Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

17

On February 24, 2012, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss this action for Plaintiff's failure to exhaust

18

administrative remedies. (Doc. 53.) By this motion, Defendants seek to dismiss this action in its

19

entirety.

20

On December 22, 2011, the Court issued the Second Informational Order, Motion to Dismiss

21

Notice, and Summary Judgment Notice in this action, providing Plaintiff with notice pursuant to Rand

22

v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 1998), advising Plaintiff of his rights and responsibilities to oppose

23

a motion to dismiss such as that filed by Defendants in this action. (Doc. 52-1.) At this juncture,

24

Plaintiff shall be provided with another copy of the Order/Notice. Woods v. Carey, No. 09-15548, 09-

25

16113, 2012 WL 2626912 (9th Cir. July 6, 2012). Plaintiff is advised to immediately review the

26

Order/Notice in its entirety for information pertaining to his opposition to Defendants’ pending motion

27

to dismiss.

28

1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve another copy of the Second

2

Informational Order, Motion to Dismiss Notice and Summary Judgment Notice (Doc. 52-1) upon

3

Plaintiff, for his review.

4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6

Dated:
6i0kij

July 9, 2012

/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2