Williams v. Harrington et al

Filing 24

ORDER REQUIRING Plaintiff to File Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to Defendants' 10 Motion; Plaintiff's Response Due by 9/26/2011 signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 8/22/2011. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 TASHION WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, 10 v. 11 12 KELLY HARRINGTON, et al., Defendants. 13 CASE NO. 1:09-cv-02259-LJO-GBC (PC) ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NONOPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION (ECF No. 10) PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE DUE BY / 9/26/2011 14 ORDER 15 16 On July 6, 2011, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 23.) Plaintiff was 17 required to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion within twenty- 18 one days, but has not done so. Local Rule 78-230(l). 19 Accordingly, not later than September 26, 2011, Plaintiff must file an opposition or 20 a statement of non-opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. If Plaintiff fails to comply 21 with this Order, this action will be dismissed for failure to obey the Court’s order and failure 22 to prosecute. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 Dated: 1j0bbc August 22, 2011 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?