Thomas v. Wilber et al

Filing 164

ORDER GRANTING 163 Motion for Thirty-Day Extension of Time to File Dispositional Documents signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/4/2016. Dispositional Documents due within thirty (30) days. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 JASON LATRELL THOMAS, Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 13 M. WILBER, et al., 14 Case No. 1:10-cv-00006-SKO (PC) ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR THIRTY-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DISPOSITIONAL DOCUMENTS (Doc. 163) Defendants. _____________________________________/ 15 16 Plaintiff Jason Latrell Thomas (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 17 pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on January 4, 2010. On 18 September 22, 2014, the Court appointed counsel to represent Plaintiff. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). This 19 action is proceeding to trial on Plaintiff’s (1) Eighth Amendment excessive force claim against 20 Defendants Vikjord and Hernandez, (2) First Amendment retaliation claim against Defendant 21 Vikjord arising out of the use of force on August 25, 2007, and (3) First Amendment retaliation 22 claim against Defendants Frescura and Price arising out of the use of force on or around February 23 18, 2007. 24 On December 2, 2015, Plaintiff filed a notice of settlement. On December 22, 2015, 25 Plaintiff filed a status report and a request for a thirty-day extension of time to file the 26 dispositional documents. Local Rule 160(b). 27 /// 28 /// Good cause having been shown, Plaintiff’s request for a thirty-day extension of time to file 1 2 dispositional documents in compliance with Local Rule 160(b) is HEREBY GRANTED. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: January 4, 2016 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?