Shepard v. Tilton et al
ORDER DIRECTING Defendants to Respond to 69 , 74 Plaintiff's Motions for Settlement Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 1/30/2013. Defendants' Response due within fourteen (14) days. (Jessen, A)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00023-BAM PC
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO
RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR
R. PEREZ, et al.,
(ECF Nos. 69, 74)
Plaintiff Lamont Shepard (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on
Plaintiff’s complaint Defendants L.A. Martinez, R. Perez, P. Garcia, J. Soto, E. De la Cruz and A
Trevino for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment. This action is currently set for
a telephonic trial confirmation hearing on March 15, 2013, and for a jury trial on May 6, 2013.
On November 29, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting a settlement conference. (ECF
No. 69.) Defendants did not respond. On January 28, 2013, Plaintiff filed a second motion
requesting a settlement conference. (ECF No. 74.)
Defendants shall respond to Plaintiff’s motions and notify the Court whether they believe,
in good faith, that settlement in this case is a possibility and whether they are interested in having
a settlement conference scheduled by the Court. A settlement conference will be set only if the
parties are willing to make a meaningful attempt to resolve this action and are willing to
compromise. Settlement conferences may be held in person or by video conference at the Court.
If Defendants wish to have a settlement conference scheduled, counsel shall notify the Court
whether there are security concerns that would prohibit such a conference. If security concerns exist,
counsel shall notify the Court whether those concerns can be addressed if Plaintiff is transferred for
settlement only and then returned to prison.
Accordingly, within fourteen (14) days from the date of service of this order, Defendants
shall file a written response to Plaintiff’s motions for a settlement conference and this order. If a
settlement conference is set, the Court will issue a separate order indicating each of the parties’
responsibilities regarding the conference.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
January 30, 2013
/s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?