Shepard v. Tilton et al
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 69 74 Motions for Settlement Conference without Prejudice signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 2/21/2013. (Sant Agata, S)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00023-BAM PC
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS
FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
R. PEREZ, et al.,
(ECF Nos. 69, 74)
Plaintiff Lamont Shepard (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on
Plaintiff’s complaint Defendants L.A. Martinez, R. Perez, P. Garcia, J. Soto, E. De la Cruz and A
Trevino for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment. A telephonic trial confirmation
hearing is set for March 15, 2013, and a jury trial is set for May 6, 2013.
On November 29, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting a settlement conference. (ECF
No. 69.) Defendants did not respond. On January 28, 2013, Plaintiff filed a second motion
requesting a settlement conference. (ECF No. 74.) On January 30, 2013, the Court ordered
Defendants to respond to Plaintiff’s motions and notify the Court whether they believed, in good
faith, that settlement in this case was a possibility and whether they were interested in having a
settlement conference scheduled by the Court.
On February 13, 2013, Defendants filed a response stating that they were willing to make a
meaningful attempt to resolve this case, but did not believe that a settlement was possible because
of Plaintiff’s expectations about the worth of his case. (ECF No. 80.) Defendants also indicated that
Plaintiff owes more than $5,000 in restitution, but they are unlikely to offer to settle this case for
more than $5,000, which makes settlement highly unlikely.
The Court declines to schedule a settlement conference at this time. No settlement
conference will be scheduled until such time as both parties agree that settlement in the action is
possible. Should both parties be willing to participate in a settlement conference in a good faith
effort to settle this action, they may file a joint request for a settlement conference. Plaintiff’s
motions for a settlement conference are HEREBY DENIED without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
February 21, 2013
/s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?