Shepard v. Tilton et al

Filing 83

ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 69 74 Motions for Settlement Conference without Prejudice signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 2/21/2013. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 LAMONT SHEPARD, 10 CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00023-BAM PC Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE WITHOUT PREJUDICE R. PEREZ, et al., 13 (ECF Nos. 69, 74) Defendants. / 14 15 Plaintiff Lamont Shepard (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 16 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on 17 Plaintiff’s complaint Defendants L.A. Martinez, R. Perez, P. Garcia, J. Soto, E. De la Cruz and A 18 Trevino for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment. A telephonic trial confirmation 19 hearing is set for March 15, 2013, and a jury trial is set for May 6, 2013. 20 On November 29, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting a settlement conference. (ECF 21 No. 69.) Defendants did not respond. On January 28, 2013, Plaintiff filed a second motion 22 requesting a settlement conference. (ECF No. 74.) On January 30, 2013, the Court ordered 23 Defendants to respond to Plaintiff’s motions and notify the Court whether they believed, in good 24 faith, that settlement in this case was a possibility and whether they were interested in having a 25 settlement conference scheduled by the Court. 26 On February 13, 2013, Defendants filed a response stating that they were willing to make a 27 meaningful attempt to resolve this case, but did not believe that a settlement was possible because 28 of Plaintiff’s expectations about the worth of his case. (ECF No. 80.) Defendants also indicated that 1 1 Plaintiff owes more than $5,000 in restitution, but they are unlikely to offer to settle this case for 2 more than $5,000, which makes settlement highly unlikely. 3 The Court declines to schedule a settlement conference at this time. No settlement 4 conference will be scheduled until such time as both parties agree that settlement in the action is 5 possible. Should both parties be willing to participate in a settlement conference in a good faith 6 effort to settle this action, they may file a joint request for a settlement conference. Plaintiff’s 7 motions for a settlement conference are HEREBY DENIED without prejudice. 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 10c20k February 21, 2013 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?