Shepard v. Tilton et al

Filing 90

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 3/19/2013 directing Clerk's Office to mail Plaintiff a copy of 43 Exhibits. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 LAMONT SHEPARD, 10 11 CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00023-BAM PC Plaintiff, SECOND ORDER DIRECTING CLERK’S OFFICE TO MAIL PLAINTIFF A COPY OF HIS EXHIBITS (ECF No. 43) SUBMITTED WITH HIS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT v. 12 R. PEREZ, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 / 15 Plaintiff Lamont Shepard (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 16 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on 17 Plaintiff’s complaint against Defendants L.A. Martinez, R. Perez, P. Garcia, J. Soto, E. De la Cruz 18 and A Trevino for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment. A jury trial is set for May 19 6, 2013. 20 On February 8, 2013, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting copies of his summary judgment 21 motion and exhibits. (ECF No. 78.) The Court granted Plaintiff’s request on February 15, 2013, and 22 directed the Clerk’s office to mail Plaintiff a copy of his motion for summary judgment and his 23 corresponding exhibits filed on February 9, 2012. (ECF No. 82.) During a telephonic trial 24 confirmation hearing on March 18, 2013, Plaintiff informed the Court that he received a copy of the 25 motion for summary judgment, but did not receive copies of his exhibits. 26 27 28 1 1 Upon review of the docket, it appears that Plaintiff was not sent a copy of his exhibits. 2 Accordingly, the Clerk’s office is directed to mail Plaintiff a copy of his exhibits, identified as 3 CM/ECF No. 43, which were filed on February 9, 2012. 4 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 10c20k March 19, 2013 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?