Saint-Fleur v. Taylor et al

Filing 23

STIPULATION and ORDER to Extend Case deadlines signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 10/29/2010. Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 10/15/2010. Rebuttal Expert Disclosure due by 11/15/2010, Completion of All Discovery due by 12/20/2010, All Non-Dispositive Pre-Trial Motions to be filed not later than 1/10/2011. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING DISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL MOTIONS, AND ALL OTHER REQUIREMENTS OF THE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER, REMAINS UNCHANGED. (Leon-Guerrero, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 George C. Aucoin The Law Office of George C. Aucoin, APLC 3500 N. Hullen Street Metairie, LA 70002 (985) 727-2359 Fax: (985) 951-7490 aucoingc@att.net Attorney for the Plaintiff IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PIERRE E. SAINT-FLEUR Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF FRESNO, CALIFORNIA, AND DONNA TAYLOR, INDIVIDUALLY, Defendants. RECITALS 1. The Court's Scheduling Conference Order establishes and orders the following No. 1:10-CV-00026-OWW-JLT FIRST STIPULATION TO EXTENSION OF CASE DEADLINES AND [PROPOSED] ORDER deadlines: (1) October 1, 2010 for expert witness disclosures; (2) November 1, 2010 for rebuttal and supplemental expert witness disclosures; (3) December 10, 2010 for discovery cut-off; (4) December 27, 2010 for the filing of non-dispositive motions; and (5) January 27, 2010 for the filing of dispositive motions. FIRST STIPULATION TO EXTENSION OF CASE DEADLINES AND [PROPOSED] ORDER - 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2. On October 2, 2010, Plaintiff Pierre E. Saint-Fleur served on Defendants County of Fresno and Donna Taylor his designation of two experts in this matter, Dr. Stan V. Smith and Andrew Rosen. Plaintiff's designations did not include an expert witness report for either expert as required by Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 3. On October 15, 2010, Plaintiff served Defendants with the expert witness report of Dr. Smith, but did not serve any expert report by Mr. Rosen. STIPULATION IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiff and Defendants through each of their undersigned counsel, that the Scheduling Conference Order be amended to: Expert Witness Designation on October 15, 2010; Rebuttal Expert Disclosure on November 15, 2010; Completion of All Discovery on or before December 20, 2010; Non-dispositive motions filed not later than January 10, 2011; and Dispositive motions filed not later than February 11, 2011. DATED: October 26, 2010 By: /s/ George C. Aucoin George C. Aucoin The Law Office of George C. Aucoin, APLC 3500 N. Hullen Street Metairie, LA 70002 (985) 727-2359 Fax: (985) 951-7490 aucoingc@att.net Attorney for the Plaintiff FIRST STIPULATION TO EXTENSION OF CASE DEADLINES AND [PROPOSED] ORDER - 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 DEAC_Signature-END: DATED: October 26, 2010 By: Sloan Simmons Lozano Smith, Attorneys at Law One Capital Mall, Suite 640 Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 329-7433 Fax: (916) 329-9050 ssimmons@lozanosmith.com Attorney for Defendants ORDER Based on the Stipulation of the parties hereto, and good cause appearing, therefore: IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall be granted extensions of time in the Case Scheduling Conference Order (Doc. 16) to: Expert Witness Designation on October 15, 2010; Rebuttal Expert Disclosure on November 15, 2010; Completion of All Discovery on or before December 20, 2010; All Non-Dispositive Pre-Trial Motions to be filed not later than January 10, 2011. The deadline for filing dispositive pretrial motions, and all other requirements of the Scheduling Conference Order, remains unchanged. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 29, 2010 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9j7khijed FIRST STIPULATION TO EXTENSION OF CASE DEADLINES AND [PROPOSED] ORDER - 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?